Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Limb Salvage Surgery for Bone Sarcomas of the Lower Limb

Abstract Limb salvage surgery (LSS) has been the cornerstone of surgical treatment for bone sarcomas for several decades. Advances in oncological treatments, including neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, have facilitated a shift from amputation to LSS. However, the decision to pursue LSS involves careful consideration of associated risks and complications. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate a cohort of patients (n = 59) who underwent LSS for the resection of bone sarcomas in the lower limb, followed by reconstruction with a tumour endoprosthesis. These procedures were performed at a single institution by multiple surgeons. The collected data was analysed in order to identify potential risk factors associated with both patient survival and endoprosthesis longevity. Several variables, that significantly increased mortality risk, were identified within the patient cohort using multivariate regression analysis. Older patients (above 61) had a 9.74-fold increased risk of death, suggesting age is a major risk factor. Patients with pathological fractures had a 7.83 times higher risk of death, which is a strong predictor. All of these variable findings were statistically significant. Additionally, we characterized the risks and failure modes of tumour endoprostheses within this cohort. We have found different types of failure modes associated with each other. We also looked into patient survival according to the Enneking classification of bone tumour staging. In our cohort, patient distribution across Enneking stages showed a predominance of advanced tumours. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated a clear decline in overall survival with increasing stage. Overall, these findings underline both the predominance of high-grade disease at diagnosis in this series and a strong correlation between higher Enneking stage and diminished long-term survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bratislavské lekárske listy/Bratislava medical journal
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44411-025-00324-0
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Limb Salvage Surgery for Bone Sarcomas of the Lower Limb

Martin Malina, Martin Lacko, Yousef Naser, B. Šteňo et al.
Bratislavské lekárske listy/Bratislava medical journal
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Limb Salvage Surgery for Bone Sarcomas of the Lower Limb

Martin Malina, Martin Lacko, Yousef Naser, B. Šteňo, A Svec
article en

Abstract

Abstract Limb salvage surgery (LSS) has been the cornerstone of surgical treatment for bone sarcomas for several decades. Advances in oncological treatments, including neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, have facilitated a shift from amputation to LSS. However, the decision to pursue LSS involves careful consideration of associated risks and complications. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate a cohort of patients (n = 59) who underwent LSS for the resection of bone sarcomas in the lower limb, followed by reconstruction with a tumour endoprosthesis. These procedures were performed at a single institution by multiple surgeons. The collected data was analysed in order to identify potential risk factors associated with both patient survival and endoprosthesis longevity. Several variables, that significantly increased mortality risk, were identified within the patient cohort using multivariate regression analysis. Older patients (above 61) had a 9.74-fold increased risk of death, suggesting age is a major risk factor. Patients with pathological fractures had a 7.83 times higher risk of death, which is a strong predictor. All of these variable findings were statistically significant. Additionally, we characterized the risks and failure modes of tumour endoprostheses within this cohort. We have found different types of failure modes associated with each other. We also looked into patient survival according to the Enneking classification of bone tumour staging. In our cohort, patient distribution across Enneking stages showed a predominance of advanced tumours. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated a clear decline in overall survival with increasing stage. Overall, these findings underline both the predominance of high-grade disease at diagnosis in this series and a strong correlation between higher Enneking stage and diminished long-term survival.

Bratislavské lekárske listy/Bratislava medical journalVol. 126(11)
University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik (SK), Comenius University Bratislava (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Limb Salvage Surgery for Bone Sarcomas of the Lower Limb — Martin Malina, Martin Lacko, et al. · Bratislavské lekárske listy/Bratislava medical journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS