Children's Physiological Responses to Coopetition: EEG and PPG Analysis

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate differences in elementary students' physiological responses between coopetition and non-competitive situations, and to explore the educational effectiveness of coopetition-based instruction. Methods: The study involved nine third-grade students from two classes. On the first day, students completed a math test individually, and on the second day, under a coopetition setting with simulated inter-school competition. EEG and PPG were used to measure concentration, brain activity, stress, and HRV. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and effect sizes were used for analysis, with test scores, number of problems solved, and interview data used as supplementary. Results: EEG results showed significant increases in concentration and brain activity under the coopetition condition, while stress levels showed no significant difference. Effect sizes indicated a moderate increase in concentration and a large increase in brain activity, but minimal effects on stress. HRV also showed no significant difference and a small effect size. Conclusion: The findings support that coopetition can enhance motivation and engagement without increasing stress, confirming its benefits from a physiological perspective. This study offers exploratory insights by moving beyond self-report and behavioral data to physiological evidence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Teacher Education
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14333/kjte.2025.41.5.11
Primary Topic
Business Strategy and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children's Physiological Responses to Coopetition: EEG and PPG Analysis

Han-Sol Lee
Korean Journal of Teacher Education
Business Strategy and Innovation
article

Children's Physiological Responses to Coopetition: EEG and PPG Analysis

Han-Sol Lee
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate differences in elementary students' physiological responses between coopetition and non-competitive situations, and to explore the educational effectiveness of coopetition-based instruction. Methods: The study involved nine third-grade students from two classes. On the first day, students completed a math test individually, and on the second day, under a coopetition setting with simulated inter-school competition. EEG and PPG were used to measure concentration, brain activity, stress, and HRV. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and effect sizes were used for analysis, with test scores, number of problems solved, and interview data used as supplementary. Results: EEG results showed significant increases in concentration and brain activity under the coopetition condition, while stress levels showed no significant difference. Effect sizes indicated a moderate increase in concentration and a large increase in brain activity, but minimal effects on stress. HRV also showed no significant difference and a small effect size. Conclusion: The findings support that coopetition can enhance motivation and engagement without increasing stress, confirming its benefits from a physiological perspective. This study offers exploratory insights by moving beyond self-report and behavioral data to physiological evidence.

Korean Journal of Teacher EducationVol. 41(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Business Strategy and Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.