Sensitivity of winter Arctic amplification in NorESM2

Abstract. While Arctic amplification is a robust feature of both observed and projected climate change, projections of Arctic climate change are characterized by substantial uncertainty. To better understand the drivers of this uncertainty, we performed a coordinated set of fully coupled experiments with the second version of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2), in which selected processes of key importance for the Arctic climate have been modified. They include improved representation of (1) mixed-phase clouds, (2) eddy processes in the upper ocean, (3) Greenland ice sheet coupling, (4) snow on sea ice processes, and (5) ozone chemistry. For each modification, we carried out sensitivity experiments following the protocols for the historical simulation of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and a future high-emissions scenario (ssp585). This results in an ensemble of modified historical and ssp585 experiments. The sensitivity experiments all demonstrate enhanced future Arctic warming compared to the unmodified historical and ssp585 experiments. Moreover, the amplitude of the additional warming varies considerably, with the difference between the experiment with the strongest and weakest Arctic mean warming reaching ∼ 9 K during the winter season by the end of the 21st century. The warming signal is dominated by a relatively uniform Arctic warming, which, according to the CMIP6 ssp585 long-term extension, starts to equilibrate during the 22nd century. Surface temperature decomposition shows that winter warming is primarily driven by an enhanced greenhouse effect due to increased cloud cover, near-surface humidity, and the resulting increase in downwelling longwave radiation. The temperature response is most pronounced in the sea ice retreat regions, with the greatest variability between experiments occurring on the Atlantic side. We also identify an emergent constraint, linking changes in Arctic surface temperatures to changes in ocean heat fluxes and sea ice area. This highlights the importance of correctly representing (contemporary) Northern Hemisphere (NH) sea ice when assessing future projected Arctic warming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth System Dynamics
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1671-2025
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity of winter Arctic amplification in NorESM2

Dandan Tao, Camille Li, Andrea Rosendahl, Trude Storelvmo et al.
Earth System Dynamics
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
article

Sensitivity of winter Arctic amplification in NorESM2

Dandan Tao, Camille Li, Andrea Rosendahl, Trude Storelvmo, Ada Gjermundsen, Jens Boldingh Debernard, Thomas Toniazzo, Stephen Outten, Lise Seland Graff, Øyvind Seland, Heiko Goelzer, Michael Schulz, Jerry Tjiputra, Chuncheng Guo, Aleksi Nummelin, Mats Bentsen, Dirk Olivié, Petra M. Langebroek, Yanchun He, Andreas Born
article en

Abstract

Abstract. While Arctic amplification is a robust feature of both observed and projected climate change, projections of Arctic climate change are characterized by substantial uncertainty. To better understand the drivers of this uncertainty, we performed a coordinated set of fully coupled experiments with the second version of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2), in which selected processes of key importance for the Arctic climate have been modified. They include improved representation of (1) mixed-phase clouds, (2) eddy processes in the upper ocean, (3) Greenland ice sheet coupling, (4) snow on sea ice processes, and (5) ozone chemistry. For each modification, we carried out sensitivity experiments following the protocols for the historical simulation of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and a future high-emissions scenario (ssp585). This results in an ensemble of modified historical and ssp585 experiments. The sensitivity experiments all demonstrate enhanced future Arctic warming compared to the unmodified historical and ssp585 experiments. Moreover, the amplitude of the additional warming varies considerably, with the difference between the experiment with the strongest and weakest Arctic mean warming reaching ∼ 9 K during the winter season by the end of the 21st century. The warming signal is dominated by a relatively uniform Arctic warming, which, according to the CMIP6 ssp585 long-term extension, starts to equilibrate during the 22nd century. Surface temperature decomposition shows that winter warming is primarily driven by an enhanced greenhouse effect due to increased cloud cover, near-surface humidity, and the resulting increase in downwelling longwave radiation. The temperature response is most pronounced in the sea ice retreat regions, with the greatest variability between experiments occurring on the Atlantic side. We also identify an emergent constraint, linking changes in Arctic surface temperatures to changes in ocean heat fluxes and sea ice area. This highlights the importance of correctly representing (contemporary) Northern Hemisphere (NH) sea ice when assessing future projected Arctic warming.

Earth System DynamicsVol. 16(5)
Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI), Norwegian Meteorological Institute (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research (NO), Danish Meteorological Institute (DK), NORCE Research AS (NO), Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.