Comparative proteomic analysis of unfermented cocoa beans reveals key metabolic differences between fine-flavor and bulk genotypes

The organoleptic quality of cocoa beans is influenced by both post-harvest processing and genotype. Fine-flavor cocoa genotypes are especially valued for their distinctive sensory attributes, yet the proteomic differences underlying these traits remain poorly understood. In this study, we conducted a comparative proteomic analysis of unfermented beans from four <i>Theobroma cacao</i> genotypes with contrasting flavor profiles: CCN51, EET19, P7, and PA121. A total of 2,015 proteins were identified, of which 198 proteins showing significantly different abundance relative to the fine-flavor genotype EET19. Principal component analysis (PCA) effectively distinguished genotypes based on their proteomic profiles. Notably, storage proteins were more abundant in the fine-flavor genotypes, while enzymes associated with flavor precursor formation were differentially expressed. These findings provide novel insights into the proteomic basis of flavor potential in cocoa, offering targets for genotype selection and quality improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1674701
Primary Topic
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative proteomic analysis of unfermented cocoa beans reveals key metabolic differences between fine-flavor and bulk genotypes

Dominique Mingeot, Didier Vertommen, Hervé Rogez, Ana Caroline de Oliveira et al.
Frontiers in Plant Science
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
article

Comparative proteomic analysis of unfermented cocoa beans reveals key metabolic differences between fine-flavor and bulk genotypes

Dominique Mingeot, Didier Vertommen, Hervé Rogez, Ana Caroline de Oliveira, Sébastien Pyr dit Ruys, Frédéric Debode, Yordan Muhovski, Pierre Bertin
article en

Abstract

The organoleptic quality of cocoa beans is influenced by both post-harvest processing and genotype. Fine-flavor cocoa genotypes are especially valued for their distinctive sensory attributes, yet the proteomic differences underlying these traits remain poorly understood. In this study, we conducted a comparative proteomic analysis of unfermented beans from four <i>Theobroma cacao</i> genotypes with contrasting flavor profiles: CCN51, EET19, P7, and PA121. A total of 2,015 proteins were identified, of which 198 proteins showing significantly different abundance relative to the fine-flavor genotype EET19. Principal component analysis (PCA) effectively distinguished genotypes based on their proteomic profiles. Notably, storage proteins were more abundant in the fine-flavor genotypes, while enzymes associated with flavor precursor formation were differentially expressed. These findings provide novel insights into the proteomic basis of flavor potential in cocoa, offering targets for genotype selection and quality improvement.

Frontiers in Plant ScienceVol. 16
Amazon Research Foundation (BR), Walloon Agricultural Research Centre (BE), de Duve Institute (BE), Universidade Federal do Pará (BR), UCLouvain (BE)
Wallonie-Bruxelles International
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative proteomic analysis of unfermented cocoa beans reveals key metabolic differences between fine-flavor and bulk genotypes — Dominique Mingeot, Didier Vertommen, et al. · Frontiers in Plant Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS