Community case study of patient and clinician early engagement in research on multiple chronic conditions using an implementation guide

This case study describes the CIRCLE (Collaboratively Inspired Research Community for Learning and Engagement) project, which aimed to advance meaningful community engagement in research about multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) by co-creating a research agenda with patients, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers. The project was conducted entirely virtually, utilizing a structured process with engagement tools adapted from a prior Patient Partner Guide. It included three stages: (1) develop the virtual environment and adapt the engagement process and tools, (2) recruit and train co-creators and facilitators to test the process and tools collaboratively and make iterative improvements, and (3) implement these tools in ten-week group sessions. Project participants in the group sessions - adults with or caring for individuals with MCCs - were recruited from a previous national trial. They engaged in interactive activities such as needs assessments related to engagement, Affinity Diagrams, and Shared Lived Experiences. Results demonstrated success in two domains: (1) successful engagement in early stages of collaborative research as measured by recruitment (59 initial participants) and high levels of retention (89%) and participation (100% completion of initial assessment; 78-82% of other assessments and activities; positive qualitative evaluations) and (2) successful completion of a Partnering Guide for Research (PGR) and a prioritized research agenda for MCCs. The project is a demonstration of intentional, structured virtual engagement processes and supportive environments fostering equitable partnerships and trust while producing intended products. The PGR is a replicable implementation guide to be used by other teams seeking to integrate community voices into health research starting with a research agenda.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1642655
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community case study of patient and clinician early engagement in research on multiple chronic conditions using an implementation guide

Kairn Stetler Kelley, Constance van Eeghen, Georgia Brown, Jennifer O’Rourke Lavoie et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Medicine
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
2.82
article

Community case study of patient and clinician early engagement in research on multiple chronic conditions using an implementation guide

Kairn Stetler Kelley, Constance van Eeghen, Georgia Brown, Jennifer O’Rourke Lavoie, Juvena Hitt, Beverly Canin, T.L. Robinson, Haley Van Serke, Kennedy Paron, Hanna Schweitzer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This case study describes the CIRCLE (Collaboratively Inspired Research Community for Learning and Engagement) project, which aimed to advance meaningful community engagement in research about multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) by co-creating a research agenda with patients, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers. The project was conducted entirely virtually, utilizing a structured process with engagement tools adapted from a prior Patient Partner Guide. It included three stages: (1) develop the virtual environment and adapt the engagement process and tools, (2) recruit and train co-creators and facilitators to test the process and tools collaboratively and make iterative improvements, and (3) implement these tools in ten-week group sessions. Project participants in the group sessions - adults with or caring for individuals with MCCs - were recruited from a previous national trial. They engaged in interactive activities such as needs assessments related to engagement, Affinity Diagrams, and Shared Lived Experiences. Results demonstrated success in two domains: (1) successful engagement in early stages of collaborative research as measured by recruitment (59 initial participants) and high levels of retention (89%) and participation (100% completion of initial assessment; 78-82% of other assessments and activities; positive qualitative evaluations) and (2) successful completion of a Partnering Guide for Research (PGR) and a prioritized research agenda for MCCs. The project is a demonstration of intentional, structured virtual engagement processes and supportive environments fostering equitable partnerships and trust while producing intended products. The PGR is a replicable implementation guide to be used by other teams seeking to integrate community voices into health research starting with a research agenda.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 12
University of Vermont (US), City of Hope (US)
Arizona State University, University of Washington, University of Rochester, Medical Center, University of Rochester
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.