An Evaluation and Challenges of Local Education Finance Since the 5.31 Education Reform

The purpose of this article, marking the 30th anniversary of the 5.31 Education Reform, aims to historically review the changes in local education finance over the past three decades and to provide a multi-faceted diagnosis of its outcomes and challenges. For this purpose, the study employs an analytical framework based on five core values of education finance—stability, adequacy, equity, autonomy, and efficiency—applied across the fiscal stages of revenue generation, allocation, and operation. The analysis reveals that since the 5.31 Education Reform, local education finance has achieved remarkable quantitative growth, such as in per-student public expenditure, driven by the system linking its funding to a fixed percentage of national tax revenue. However, an evaluation based on the core principles of its operation reveals significant challenges. First, in terms of stability, despite its legal foundation, the system's actual stability has been undermined by inaccurate government tax revenue forecasts and a rigid settlement system, leading to severe annual fluctuations in funding. Second, regarding adequacy, while macro-level indicators appear favorable, there are structural limitations stemming from the practice of 'spending based on revenue', rather than actual educational needs, and issues with funds not being sufficiently delivered to the school level. Third, in terms of equity, while a high level of horizontal equity among regions has been achieved, vertical equity, which considers the diverse needs of disadvantaged students, remains insufficient. Fourth, concerning autonomy, the principle of lump-sum allocation has been weakened by an excessive number of budget measurement items, eroding the ideal of local educational autonomy. Finally, regarding efficiency, external debates over excessive unused funds and reserves, along with the fiscal imbalance between K-12 and higher education, were identified as critical challenges for the future.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Society for the Economics and Finance of Education
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46967/jefe.2025.34.3.51
Primary Topic
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Evaluation and Challenges of Local Education Finance Since the 5.31 Education Reform

Hongju Yun
The Korean Society for the Economics and Finance of Education
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
article

An Evaluation and Challenges of Local Education Finance Since the 5.31 Education Reform

Hongju Yun
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this article, marking the 30th anniversary of the 5.31 Education Reform, aims to historically review the changes in local education finance over the past three decades and to provide a multi-faceted diagnosis of its outcomes and challenges. For this purpose, the study employs an analytical framework based on five core values of education finance—stability, adequacy, equity, autonomy, and efficiency—applied across the fiscal stages of revenue generation, allocation, and operation. The analysis reveals that since the 5.31 Education Reform, local education finance has achieved remarkable quantitative growth, such as in per-student public expenditure, driven by the system linking its funding to a fixed percentage of national tax revenue. However, an evaluation based on the core principles of its operation reveals significant challenges. First, in terms of stability, despite its legal foundation, the system's actual stability has been undermined by inaccurate government tax revenue forecasts and a rigid settlement system, leading to severe annual fluctuations in funding. Second, regarding adequacy, while macro-level indicators appear favorable, there are structural limitations stemming from the practice of 'spending based on revenue', rather than actual educational needs, and issues with funds not being sufficiently delivered to the school level. Third, in terms of equity, while a high level of horizontal equity among regions has been achieved, vertical equity, which considers the diverse needs of disadvantaged students, remains insufficient. Fourth, concerning autonomy, the principle of lump-sum allocation has been weakened by an excessive number of budget measurement items, eroding the ideal of local educational autonomy. Finally, regarding efficiency, external debates over excessive unused funds and reserves, along with the fiscal imbalance between K-12 and higher education, were identified as critical challenges for the future.

The Korean Society for the Economics and Finance of EducationVol. 34(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Evaluation and Challenges of Local Education Finance Since the 5.31 Education Reform — Hongju Yun · The Korean Society for the Economics and Finance of Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS