Evaluation methods for XPS depth profiling; A review

In recent years X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) has become a widespread approach in modern material science to study numerous aspects (energy production, bio-interface analysis, catalysis etc.) of widely varied functional materials (metals, polymers, semiconductors). In the majority of these applications there is a need of the detailed knowledge of the surface and surface close chemistry. XPS with its excellent chemical sensitivity can directly be applied to the analysis of the surface layer in the range of some nms. In case of thicker regions, however, it has to be combined with various depth profiling techniques. The evaluation of depth profiles especially in case of ion etch techniques must be performed with special care due to the emergence of ion induced artefacts (mixing, preferential sputtering, roughening etc.). In this review we present the advantages and disadvantages of the techniques available for tackling these issues focusing especially on ion etching techniques: monoatomic and cluster argon sputtering. Evaluation problems are discussed through case studies aiming to provide a guide for choosing between the different methods, highlighting pitfalls and proposing solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Surface Science Advances
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2025.100872
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation methods for XPS depth profiling; A review

A.S. Racz, M. Menyhárd
10 citations
Applied Surface Science Advances
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
6.61
article

Evaluation methods for XPS depth profiling; A review

A.S. Racz, M. Menyhárd
article en
10 citations

Abstract

In recent years X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) has become a widespread approach in modern material science to study numerous aspects (energy production, bio-interface analysis, catalysis etc.) of widely varied functional materials (metals, polymers, semiconductors). In the majority of these applications there is a need of the detailed knowledge of the surface and surface close chemistry. XPS with its excellent chemical sensitivity can directly be applied to the analysis of the surface layer in the range of some nms. In case of thicker regions, however, it has to be combined with various depth profiling techniques. The evaluation of depth profiles especially in case of ion etch techniques must be performed with special care due to the emergence of ion induced artefacts (mixing, preferential sputtering, roughening etc.). In this review we present the advantages and disadvantages of the techniques available for tackling these issues focusing especially on ion etching techniques: monoatomic and cluster argon sputtering. Evaluation problems are discussed through case studies aiming to provide a guide for choosing between the different methods, highlighting pitfalls and proposing solutions.

Applied Surface Science AdvancesVol. 30
HUN-REN Centre for Energy Research (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
6.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation methods for XPS depth profiling; A review — A.S. Racz, M. Menyhárd · Applied Surface Science Advances (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS