Human activities accelerate recovery of gross ecosystem product following vegetation disturbances

Post-disturbance vegetation recovery is critical for sustaining ecosystem services, yet the mechanisms underlying this process, particularly the role of human activities, remain insufficiently understood. This study focuses on Zhejiang Province, China, over the period 2000–2020, employing Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) as a comprehensive indicator to assess vegetation recovery, which integrates key ecosystem services such as water conservation, soil conservation, air purification, and carbon storage. Disturbance dynamics were identified using the LandTrendr algorithm, and high-resolution GEP was estimated from multi-source remote sensing datasets. We examined recovery drivers through a Random Forest model and the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis. The results show that most disturbed vegetation exhibited strong resilience, with 78.5% recovering within one to two years, while 13.1% of the disturbed area, primarily located in urbanized regions, failed to recover fully. The Random Forest model achieved robust explanatory performance (R 2 = 0.69, RMSE = 3.01), with anthropogenic factors, particularly nighttime light intensity and road proximity, emerging as dominant drivers surpassing climatic and topographic variables. SHAP partial dependence plots revealed that human activities generally accelerated recovery by shortening recovery intervals. Furthermore, a counterfactual simulation excluding anthropogenic factors demonstrated that the average recovery interval would increase substantially from 1.47 to 3.96 years in the absence of human activities. Collectively, these findings underscored the critical role of human activities in facilitating ecosystem recovery following disturbance, providing valuable implications for ecological restoration and sustainable ecosystem management. • Gross ecosystem productivity shows strong negative correlation with disturbance area. • Over 78.5% of disturbed vegetation recovered within one to two years, indicating high resilience. • SHAP analysis identifies human activity factors as dominant drivers of GEP recovery. • Human activities shortened recovery interval by ∼2.5 years compared with natural scenario.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Critical Zone
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecz.2025.100048
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human activities accelerate recovery of gross ecosystem product following vegetation disturbances

Lianqing Zhou, Hancheng Guo, Lingkun Chen, Siying He et al.
1 citations
Earth Critical Zone
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
article

Human activities accelerate recovery of gross ecosystem product following vegetation disturbances

Lianqing Zhou, Hancheng Guo, Lingkun Chen, Siying He, Zihang Lou, Rui Lu, Su Ye, Zhongxing Chen, Zhou Shi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Post-disturbance vegetation recovery is critical for sustaining ecosystem services, yet the mechanisms underlying this process, particularly the role of human activities, remain insufficiently understood. This study focuses on Zhejiang Province, China, over the period 2000–2020, employing Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) as a comprehensive indicator to assess vegetation recovery, which integrates key ecosystem services such as water conservation, soil conservation, air purification, and carbon storage. Disturbance dynamics were identified using the LandTrendr algorithm, and high-resolution GEP was estimated from multi-source remote sensing datasets. We examined recovery drivers through a Random Forest model and the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis. The results show that most disturbed vegetation exhibited strong resilience, with 78.5% recovering within one to two years, while 13.1% of the disturbed area, primarily located in urbanized regions, failed to recover fully. The Random Forest model achieved robust explanatory performance (R 2 = 0.69, RMSE = 3.01), with anthropogenic factors, particularly nighttime light intensity and road proximity, emerging as dominant drivers surpassing climatic and topographic variables. SHAP partial dependence plots revealed that human activities generally accelerated recovery by shortening recovery intervals. Furthermore, a counterfactual simulation excluding anthropogenic factors demonstrated that the average recovery interval would increase substantially from 1.47 to 3.96 years in the absence of human activities. Collectively, these findings underscored the critical role of human activities in facilitating ecosystem recovery following disturbance, providing valuable implications for ecological restoration and sustainable ecosystem management. • Gross ecosystem productivity shows strong negative correlation with disturbance area. • Over 78.5% of disturbed vegetation recovered within one to two years, indicating high resilience. • SHAP analysis identifies human activity factors as dominant drivers of GEP recovery. • Human activities shortened recovery interval by ∼2.5 years compared with natural scenario.

Earth Critical ZoneVol. 2
Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.