Inequities in Climate Change Perceptions: The Rural Paradox

The southeastern United States faces escalating climate threats, including hurricanes, sea-level rise, flooding, and extreme heat, with socially and economically disadvantaged groups bearing disproportionate impacts. The low, near sea-level topography of Eastern North Carolina exemplifies these inequities. Spanning more than 15,000 square miles, the region’s proximity to the Atlantic Ocean, extensive estuaries, and rural setting heighten vulnerability, while poverty, lower education, and limited access to health care, transportation, and digital infrastructure amplify risks. Despite these vulnerabilities, little research has examined how communities in the region perceive climate change. The primary objective was to assess local climate beliefs, risks, behaviors, and policy support across Eastern North Carolina, and to evaluate whether these diverged from modeled state and national estimates. A secondary objective was to examine variation in perceptions using county-level indicators of climate vulnerability: urbanicity, economic burden, and environmental sensitivity. Survey questions were embedded in a cross-sectional health assessment across 36 counties in Eastern North Carolina from April 1 to July 1, 2021. A total of 15,961 adults completed the survey in English or Spanish. Individual responses were weighted and compared with state and national modeled estimates. Climate-vulnerability classifications and participant responses were assessed at the county level. Multivariable logistic regression identified demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic predictors of perceptions. Findings showed that participants in Eastern North Carolina were less likely to believe climate change is occurring (68.4% vs. 71–72%) or to worry about its effects (54.2% vs. 64–65%) compared with state and national modeled estimates. Perceptions varied significantly by socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, age, and county-level classifications, with urban and more economically advantaged counties reporting higher perceived risks and stronger policy support than rural, disadvantaged areas. Promoting climate literacy, fostering community champions, and amplifying local voices are critical for addressing climate vulnerabilities and provide a scalable model for equity-focused, community-driven strategies to build resilience across diverse regions. Keywords : community engagement, vulnerability, global warming, mitigation, adaptation, inequality, susceptibility

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Climate Research
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52338/jocr.2025.5123
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inequities in Climate Change Perceptions: The Rural Paradox

Gregory D. Kearney, Lok R. Pokhrel, Xiangming Fang, Satomi Imai et al.
Journal of Climate Research
Rural development and sustainability
article

Inequities in Climate Change Perceptions: The Rural Paradox

Gregory D. Kearney, Lok R. Pokhrel, Xiangming Fang, Satomi Imai, Katherine A. Jones
article en

Abstract

The southeastern United States faces escalating climate threats, including hurricanes, sea-level rise, flooding, and extreme heat, with socially and economically disadvantaged groups bearing disproportionate impacts. The low, near sea-level topography of Eastern North Carolina exemplifies these inequities. Spanning more than 15,000 square miles, the region’s proximity to the Atlantic Ocean, extensive estuaries, and rural setting heighten vulnerability, while poverty, lower education, and limited access to health care, transportation, and digital infrastructure amplify risks. Despite these vulnerabilities, little research has examined how communities in the region perceive climate change. The primary objective was to assess local climate beliefs, risks, behaviors, and policy support across Eastern North Carolina, and to evaluate whether these diverged from modeled state and national estimates. A secondary objective was to examine variation in perceptions using county-level indicators of climate vulnerability: urbanicity, economic burden, and environmental sensitivity. Survey questions were embedded in a cross-sectional health assessment across 36 counties in Eastern North Carolina from April 1 to July 1, 2021. A total of 15,961 adults completed the survey in English or Spanish. Individual responses were weighted and compared with state and national modeled estimates. Climate-vulnerability classifications and participant responses were assessed at the county level. Multivariable logistic regression identified demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic predictors of perceptions. Findings showed that participants in Eastern North Carolina were less likely to believe climate change is occurring (68.4% vs. 71–72%) or to worry about its effects (54.2% vs. 64–65%) compared with state and national modeled estimates. Perceptions varied significantly by socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, age, and county-level classifications, with urban and more economically advantaged counties reporting higher perceived risks and stronger policy support than rural, disadvantaged areas. Promoting climate literacy, fostering community champions, and amplifying local voices are critical for addressing climate vulnerabilities and provide a scalable model for equity-focused, community-driven strategies to build resilience across diverse regions. Keywords : community engagement, vulnerability, global warming, mitigation, adaptation, inequality, susceptibility

Journal of Climate ResearchVol. 13(1)
Yale University, George Mason University
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Rural development and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.