A Critical Study of the Alignment between English Communicative Competency and Example Sentences in the 2022 Revised Korean English Curriculum

This study investigates the extent to which the 2022 Revised Korean English Curriculum’s reconceptualization of English communicative competency is instantiated in the example sentences for communicative functions. While the curriculum posits this competency as a meta-competency integrating the six core competencies, the examples privilege grammatical accuracy and formulaic expressions, giving scant attention to sociolinguistic, discourse, and strategic dimensions. This misalignment undercuts the curriculum’s aim of cultivating integrated, future-oriented competency. Because Annex 2 serves as guidance for teachers, textbook writers, and test developers, its reductionism risks entrenching a structuralist orientation. The analysis also examines design problems traceable to the Seventh Curriculum, notably limited developmental progression and weak contextual appropriateness. Accordingly, the study recommends a redesign to strengthen the linkage between curricular goals and classroom practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54346/sjer.2025.34.3.61
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Critical Study of the Alignment between English Communicative Competency and Example Sentences in the 2022 Revised Korean English Curriculum

Kwangtaek Han, Sul Kim
Educational Research and Pedagogy
article

A Critical Study of the Alignment between English Communicative Competency and Example Sentences in the 2022 Revised Korean English Curriculum

Kwangtaek Han, Sul Kim
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the extent to which the 2022 Revised Korean English Curriculum’s reconceptualization of English communicative competency is instantiated in the example sentences for communicative functions. While the curriculum posits this competency as a meta-competency integrating the six core competencies, the examples privilege grammatical accuracy and formulaic expressions, giving scant attention to sociolinguistic, discourse, and strategic dimensions. This misalignment undercuts the curriculum’s aim of cultivating integrated, future-oriented competency. Because Annex 2 serves as guidance for teachers, textbook writers, and test developers, its reductionism risks entrenching a structuralist orientation. The analysis also examines design problems traceable to the Seventh Curriculum, notably limited developmental progression and weak contextual appropriateness. Accordingly, the study recommends a redesign to strengthen the linkage between curricular goals and classroom practice.

Vol. 34(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Educational Research and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.