Predicting land-surface specific humidity from radiative temperature and ambient weather for evapotranspiration modelling: Lessons from South Australian field sites

• Land-surface specific humidity can be predicted from radiative temperature and ambient weather. • The method works better under early afternoon conditions. • Drone-mapped radiative temperatures capture surface humidity distribution. • This method is suitable for MEP-based ET modelling in both sunny and cloudy conditions. Land-surface specific humidity is crucial for estimating evapotranspiration (ET) using the Maximum Entropy Production (MEP) method. However, acquiring relevant data, particularly the spatially varying land-surface specific humidity, can be challenging. Here, we show that the deviation of land-surface specific humidity from the ambient specific humidity can be estimated using surface radiative temperature and ambient micrometeorological variables (referred to as the Tr-Weather method). We tested this method at five sites in South Australia with varying vegetation and topography. The results indicate that the Tr-Weather method generally performs the best for early afternoon. The performance varies with seasons, with better results for summer and autumn. Slope and aspect change the timing of optimal predictions, particularly in areas with significant topographic variations. Additionally, this method effectively predicts spatial distribution of the land-surface specific humidity by integrating drone-derived temperature and ambient meteorological data, with an R² value of 0.96. For MEP-based understory ET modelling, the Tr-Weather method outperforms the substituted specific humidity from nearby weather stations, especially under sunny conditions where the MEP ET model using ambient specific humidity tends to underestimate ET. The method is empirical and was developed based on observations in two different environments, further research is required to extend and validate the Tr-Weather approach over other bioclimate zones. Nevertheless, our findings demonstrate the potential of applying the Tr-Weather method, supported by drones and high-resolution satellite data, to advance MEP-based ET modelling across broader landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110878
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting land-surface specific humidity from radiative temperature and ambient weather for evapotranspiration modelling: Lessons from South Australian field sites

Okke Batelaan, Jessica R. Thompson, Huade Guan, Juliette Woods et al.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Predicting land-surface specific humidity from radiative temperature and ambient weather for evapotranspiration modelling: Lessons from South Australian field sites

Okke Batelaan, Jessica R. Thompson, Huade Guan, Juliette Woods, Karina Gutierrez, Jianfeng Gou, Hailong Wang, Wenjie Liu
article en

Abstract

• Land-surface specific humidity can be predicted from radiative temperature and ambient weather. • The method works better under early afternoon conditions. • Drone-mapped radiative temperatures capture surface humidity distribution. • This method is suitable for MEP-based ET modelling in both sunny and cloudy conditions. Land-surface specific humidity is crucial for estimating evapotranspiration (ET) using the Maximum Entropy Production (MEP) method. However, acquiring relevant data, particularly the spatially varying land-surface specific humidity, can be challenging. Here, we show that the deviation of land-surface specific humidity from the ambient specific humidity can be estimated using surface radiative temperature and ambient micrometeorological variables (referred to as the Tr-Weather method). We tested this method at five sites in South Australia with varying vegetation and topography. The results indicate that the Tr-Weather method generally performs the best for early afternoon. The performance varies with seasons, with better results for summer and autumn. Slope and aspect change the timing of optimal predictions, particularly in areas with significant topographic variations. Additionally, this method effectively predicts spatial distribution of the land-surface specific humidity by integrating drone-derived temperature and ambient meteorological data, with an R² value of 0.96. For MEP-based understory ET modelling, the Tr-Weather method outperforms the substituted specific humidity from nearby weather stations, especially under sunny conditions where the MEP ET model using ambient specific humidity tends to underestimate ET. The method is empirical and was developed based on observations in two different environments, further research is required to extend and validate the Tr-Weather approach over other bioclimate zones. Nevertheless, our findings demonstrate the potential of applying the Tr-Weather method, supported by drones and high-resolution satellite data, to advance MEP-based ET modelling across broader landscapes.

Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyVol. 375
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Hohai University (CN), Flinders University (AU), Government of South Australia (AU), National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training (AU), Huaiyin Institute of Technology (CN), Murray Darling Basin Authority (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.