The effect of bovine leukemia virus infection on health and growth of nonreplacement dairy calves

The objective of this cohort study was to determine if bovine leukemia virus (BLV) positivity, identified using quantitative PCR (qPCR), was associated with health and growth outcomes in nonreplacement dairy calves. A commercial calf-raising facility located in Southwestern Ontario was used, where a total of 768 male dairy calves (726 Holstein, 42 crossbred), estimated to be 3 to 10 d of age, had 3 blood samples taken at 1 d, 30, and 84 after arrival to the facility. Whole blood EDTA samples were taken and sent to the University of Calgary Faculty of Veterinary Medicine for qPCR analysis to determine positivity for BLV. Calves were determined to be positive using a baseline threshold of >200 relative fluorescence unit by <40 cycles. All calves were health scored 2 times daily for fecal consistency and respiratory disease, using the UC Davis respiratory scoring chart. Additionally, calves were weighed at time of arrival and weekly thereafter until they left the facility at 84 d. Mixed linear regression models were built to assess ADG (kg/d) over 84 d and feed efficiency (ME/kg of gain), whereas a Poisson model was built to assess the number of observations with a respiratory score of ≥5. Further, a negative binomial model was built to assess the number of observations with diarrhea (score of ≥2), and a zero-truncated Poisson model was built to assess the number of observations with no clinical signs of respiratory disease (e.g., respiratory score of 0). Treatment for respiratory disease and diarrhea was also analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model. Two calves had incomplete blood sampling and were therefore removed from the analysis, leaving a total of 766 calves. A total of 43 (5.9%) calves tested positive for BLV via qPCR testing over the 84-d period. Calves that were BLV-positive were associated with a greater number of observations with a respiratory score of ≥5 (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.69 to 2.17) and a lower number of observations with a score of 0 (IRR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.00). There was no difference identified between BLV positivity and ADG (kg/d), feed efficiency (ME/kg of gain), or diarrhea. Overall, this study identifies an association between BLV status and respiratory disease occurrence in preweaning calves. Although the underlying mechanisms and long-term effects remain unclear, these findings highlight the need for further research to determine whether BLV plays a causal role in respiratory disease in calves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-27122
Primary Topic
Animal health and immunology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of bovine leukemia virus infection on health and growth of nonreplacement dairy calves

David L. Renaud, Rita Couto Serrenho, Kendra Broadfoot, Frank van der Meer et al.
Journal of Dairy Science
Animal health and immunology
article

The effect of bovine leukemia virus infection on health and growth of nonreplacement dairy calves

David L. Renaud, Rita Couto Serrenho, Kendra Broadfoot, Frank van der Meer, A.J. Keunen, Francesca Pharo
article en

Abstract

The objective of this cohort study was to determine if bovine leukemia virus (BLV) positivity, identified using quantitative PCR (qPCR), was associated with health and growth outcomes in nonreplacement dairy calves. A commercial calf-raising facility located in Southwestern Ontario was used, where a total of 768 male dairy calves (726 Holstein, 42 crossbred), estimated to be 3 to 10 d of age, had 3 blood samples taken at 1 d, 30, and 84 after arrival to the facility. Whole blood EDTA samples were taken and sent to the University of Calgary Faculty of Veterinary Medicine for qPCR analysis to determine positivity for BLV. Calves were determined to be positive using a baseline threshold of >200 relative fluorescence unit by <40 cycles. All calves were health scored 2 times daily for fecal consistency and respiratory disease, using the UC Davis respiratory scoring chart. Additionally, calves were weighed at time of arrival and weekly thereafter until they left the facility at 84 d. Mixed linear regression models were built to assess ADG (kg/d) over 84 d and feed efficiency (ME/kg of gain), whereas a Poisson model was built to assess the number of observations with a respiratory score of ≥5. Further, a negative binomial model was built to assess the number of observations with diarrhea (score of ≥2), and a zero-truncated Poisson model was built to assess the number of observations with no clinical signs of respiratory disease (e.g., respiratory score of 0). Treatment for respiratory disease and diarrhea was also analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model. Two calves had incomplete blood sampling and were therefore removed from the analysis, leaving a total of 766 calves. A total of 43 (5.9%) calves tested positive for BLV via qPCR testing over the 84-d period. Calves that were BLV-positive were associated with a greater number of observations with a respiratory score of ≥5 (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.69 to 2.17) and a lower number of observations with a score of 0 (IRR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.00). There was no difference identified between BLV positivity and ADG (kg/d), feed efficiency (ME/kg of gain), or diarrhea. Overall, this study identifies an association between BLV status and respiratory disease occurrence in preweaning calves. Although the underlying mechanisms and long-term effects remain unclear, these findings highlight the need for further research to determine whether BLV plays a causal role in respiratory disease in calves.

Journal of Dairy ScienceVol. 108(12)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Guelph (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Animal health and immunology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.