The Caatinga never went missing: a reply to Zappi et al. (2025)

We clarify fundamental misunderstandings of our review on invasive species in tropical dry forests (TDFs). Contrary to Zappi et al.'s assertion, our review includes papers from the Caatinga TDF system. We provide an updated map that demonstrates (1) the dramatic inconsistencies in how TDF systems are defined, and (2) the locations of articles in Brazil included in our review. We further clarify that our review was not intended to provide a comprehensive list of all invasive species found in TDF, but rather to assess the current state of scientific research on the ecological impacts and management of invasive species in TDF. Our list of species is therefore certain to be incomplete, which we highlight as one of the findings in our review. We believe the lack of scientific publications on TDF invasives and the bias toward a small handful of species and geographies is an important finding to guide future research. Finally, we argue that the word limits for review papers may contribute to this type of misreading, as readers may not always look at the Supporting Information where specifics on methods and the full list of papers are located.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70228
Primary Topic
Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Caatinga never went missing: a reply to Zappi et al. (2025)

Mark S. Ashton, Meredith P. Martin, Sara E. Kuebbing, Nora G. Hardy et al.
Restoration Ecology
Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean
article

The Caatinga never went missing: a reply to Zappi et al. (2025)

Mark S. Ashton, Meredith P. Martin, Sara E. Kuebbing, Nora G. Hardy, Marlyse C. Duguid
article en

Abstract

We clarify fundamental misunderstandings of our review on invasive species in tropical dry forests (TDFs). Contrary to Zappi et al.'s assertion, our review includes papers from the Caatinga TDF system. We provide an updated map that demonstrates (1) the dramatic inconsistencies in how TDF systems are defined, and (2) the locations of articles in Brazil included in our review. We further clarify that our review was not intended to provide a comprehensive list of all invasive species found in TDF, but rather to assess the current state of scientific research on the ecological impacts and management of invasive species in TDF. Our list of species is therefore certain to be incomplete, which we highlight as one of the findings in our review. We believe the lack of scientific publications on TDF invasives and the bias toward a small handful of species and geographies is an important finding to guide future research. Finally, we argue that the word limits for review papers may contribute to this type of misreading, as readers may not always look at the Supporting Information where specifics on methods and the full list of papers are located.

Restoration EcologyVol. 34(1)
North Carolina State University (US), Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.