The Trends and Characteristics of Grounded Theory Research in the Field of Design : An Exploration through Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA)

This study analyzed 17 grounded theory studies in the Korean design field published between 2016 and 2025. The analysis focused on research topics, data collection methods, procedures, outcomes, and the use of mixed methods. Results indicate that grounded theory was most often applied in user experience design, with interviews as the primary data source and Strauss and Corbin’s systematic approach as the dominant procedure. Outcomes emphasized practical models over theoretical constructs, and many studies incorporated surveys or quantitative analysis alongside grounded theory. These findings suggest that, in design contexts, grounded theory is valued more for its practical utility than for methodological rigor, serving as a bridge between research and practice. The absence of constructivist approaches highlights the need for interpretive and post-qualitative directions in future work, as well as broader comparative studies that situate Korean design scholarship within an international context.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korea Institute of Design Research Society
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46248/kidrs.2025.3.331
Primary Topic
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Trends and Characteristics of Grounded Theory Research in the Field of Design : An Exploration through Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA)

B. G. Park
Korea Institute of Design Research Society
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
article

The Trends and Characteristics of Grounded Theory Research in the Field of Design : An Exploration through Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA)

B. G. Park
article en

Abstract

This study analyzed 17 grounded theory studies in the Korean design field published between 2016 and 2025. The analysis focused on research topics, data collection methods, procedures, outcomes, and the use of mixed methods. Results indicate that grounded theory was most often applied in user experience design, with interviews as the primary data source and Strauss and Corbin’s systematic approach as the dominant procedure. Outcomes emphasized practical models over theoretical constructs, and many studies incorporated surveys or quantitative analysis alongside grounded theory. These findings suggest that, in design contexts, grounded theory is valued more for its practical utility than for methodological rigor, serving as a bridge between research and practice. The absence of constructivist approaches highlights the need for interpretive and post-qualitative directions in future work, as well as broader comparative studies that situate Korean design scholarship within an international context.

Korea Institute of Design Research SocietyVol. 10(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Trends and Characteristics of Grounded Theory Research in the Field of Design : An Exploration through Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) — B. G. Park · Korea Institute of Design Research Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS