Facilities and housing, husbandry, and health management practices on Quebec dairy farms: A retrospective descriptive study

The objective of this retrospective descriptive study was to characterize housing and herd management practices of Quebec dairy farms. Pre-existent survey data (housing, husbandry, and herd health; 36 questions) collected in person by Lactanet technicians (n = 116; March 2020 to February 2021) from 1,965 herds were used. Results were segregated by facility type (freestall [FS] vs. tiestall herds [TS]) and summarized using descriptive statistics. The average herd size was 76 ± 56 cows, with 65 ± 47 milking cows, peaking at 40 ± 5 kg/d, with most herds housed their milking cows in TS facilities (80%). Of the FS herds (20%), 36% transitioned from TS after 2016. Based on the Canadian Code of Practice and peer-reviewed literature, management strengths included frequent bedding in TS, feed reduction before dry-off (>59% FS; >75% TS), routine hoof trimming (≥2×/yr in >80%), and adequate lighting (>85% maintained >200 lx for 14-17 h/d). Areas needed improvement included the adoption of secondary ventilation systems (observed in <45% FS and <20% TS), implementation of targeted dry-off protocols (>80% of herds applied a single dry-off protocol, regardless of milk yield) and greater adoption of teat sealant use (45% reported using intramammary antibiotics without teat sealants). Deep-bedded lying surfaces were uncommon (30% of far-off and lactating groups in FS; <20% of dry and lactating groups in TS). In FS herds, horizontal bars were most frequent in lactating groups (40%). In TS herds, 58% of herds calved cows in tiestalls and >80% lacked pasture or exercise pens access. Regarding hoof health, footbaths and sprays were largely absent in TS herds (90%), whereas FS herds more often used footbaths, especially for lactating cows (70%). These findings establish benchmarks for Quebec dairy herds, highlighting well-adopted practices and identifying opportunities to increase the uptake of specific management practices across the province to further enhance herd health and welfare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-26877
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facilities and housing, husbandry, and health management practices on Quebec dairy farms: A retrospective descriptive study

E.S. Ribeiro, T.F. Duffield, B. Mion, R. C. Couto et al.
Journal of Dairy Science
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
article

Facilities and housing, husbandry, and health management practices on Quebec dairy farms: A retrospective descriptive study

E.S. Ribeiro, T.F. Duffield, B. Mion, R. C. Couto, Heidi Jim
article en

Abstract

The objective of this retrospective descriptive study was to characterize housing and herd management practices of Quebec dairy farms. Pre-existent survey data (housing, husbandry, and herd health; 36 questions) collected in person by Lactanet technicians (n = 116; March 2020 to February 2021) from 1,965 herds were used. Results were segregated by facility type (freestall [FS] vs. tiestall herds [TS]) and summarized using descriptive statistics. The average herd size was 76 ± 56 cows, with 65 ± 47 milking cows, peaking at 40 ± 5 kg/d, with most herds housed their milking cows in TS facilities (80%). Of the FS herds (20%), 36% transitioned from TS after 2016. Based on the Canadian Code of Practice and peer-reviewed literature, management strengths included frequent bedding in TS, feed reduction before dry-off (>59% FS; >75% TS), routine hoof trimming (≥2×/yr in >80%), and adequate lighting (>85% maintained >200 lx for 14-17 h/d). Areas needed improvement included the adoption of secondary ventilation systems (observed in <45% FS and <20% TS), implementation of targeted dry-off protocols (>80% of herds applied a single dry-off protocol, regardless of milk yield) and greater adoption of teat sealant use (45% reported using intramammary antibiotics without teat sealants). Deep-bedded lying surfaces were uncommon (30% of far-off and lactating groups in FS; <20% of dry and lactating groups in TS). In FS herds, horizontal bars were most frequent in lactating groups (40%). In TS herds, 58% of herds calved cows in tiestalls and >80% lacked pasture or exercise pens access. Regarding hoof health, footbaths and sprays were largely absent in TS herds (90%), whereas FS herds more often used footbaths, especially for lactating cows (70%). These findings establish benchmarks for Quebec dairy herds, highlighting well-adopted practices and identifying opportunities to increase the uptake of specific management practices across the province to further enhance herd health and welfare.

Journal of Dairy ScienceVol. 108(12)
Ste. Anne's Hospital (CA), University of Guelph (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.