A novel multiphase prediction model for shale oil production

• Proposes MRFI-Gate, a novel model for forecasting shale oil multiphase production. • Integrates multi-resolution CNN and Informer to capture local features and global trends in production data. • Static parameters are incorporated as physical constraints to enhance model interpretability and generalization. • A Shut-in and Resumption Gating Module (SIR-Gating) handles abrupt operational changes. Addressing the complex challenges in dynamic shale oil production forecasting, this study proposes a new model named Multi-Resolution Fusion Informer with Gating Mechanism (MRFI-Gate) for high-precision prediction of daily oil, gas, and water production. The model innovatively combines three key mechanisms: multi-scale feature extraction through a coordinated architecture of multi-resolution convolutional neural network (MultiResCNN) and Informer to capture both local details and global trends, physics-informed constraints via static features to enhance interpretability and generalizability, and dynamic event response enabled by the Shut-in and Resumption Gating Module (SIR-Gating Module) that automatically identifies shut-in events and adjusts prediction strategies. Validation using field data demonstrates that MRFI-Gate significantly outperforms GRU, LSTM, and ANN models across key metrics including MAE, RMSE, and R 2 . On the test set, MRFI-Gate achieved a MAE of 0.1029, RMSE of 0.2013, and R 2 of 0.9006, significantly outperforming other models. MRFI-Gate’s MAE is 31.7% lower than GRU, 39.5% lower than LSTM, and 47.2% lower than ANN; RMSE is 32.8% lower than GRU, 33.3% lower than LSTM, and 49.3% lower than ANN; R 2 is 23.0% higher than GRU, 24.2% higher than LSTM, and 37.4% higher than ANN. This study provides a new hybrid modeling paradigm for multiphase prediction in shale oil production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137048
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel multiphase prediction model for shale oil production

Mengfei Zhou, Xizhe Li, Xiaomei Zhou, L Wang et al.
Fuel
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
article

A novel multiphase prediction model for shale oil production

Mengfei Zhou, Xizhe Li, Xiaomei Zhou, L Wang, Xiangyang Pei, Zhengdong Lei, Sijie He, Zhewei Chen, Nijun Qi, Longyi Wang
article en

Abstract

• Proposes MRFI-Gate, a novel model for forecasting shale oil multiphase production. • Integrates multi-resolution CNN and Informer to capture local features and global trends in production data. • Static parameters are incorporated as physical constraints to enhance model interpretability and generalization. • A Shut-in and Resumption Gating Module (SIR-Gating) handles abrupt operational changes. Addressing the complex challenges in dynamic shale oil production forecasting, this study proposes a new model named Multi-Resolution Fusion Informer with Gating Mechanism (MRFI-Gate) for high-precision prediction of daily oil, gas, and water production. The model innovatively combines three key mechanisms: multi-scale feature extraction through a coordinated architecture of multi-resolution convolutional neural network (MultiResCNN) and Informer to capture both local details and global trends, physics-informed constraints via static features to enhance interpretability and generalizability, and dynamic event response enabled by the Shut-in and Resumption Gating Module (SIR-Gating Module) that automatically identifies shut-in events and adjusts prediction strategies. Validation using field data demonstrates that MRFI-Gate significantly outperforms GRU, LSTM, and ANN models across key metrics including MAE, RMSE, and R 2 . On the test set, MRFI-Gate achieved a MAE of 0.1029, RMSE of 0.2013, and R 2 of 0.9006, significantly outperforming other models. MRFI-Gate’s MAE is 31.7% lower than GRU, 39.5% lower than LSTM, and 47.2% lower than ANN; RMSE is 32.8% lower than GRU, 33.3% lower than LSTM, and 49.3% lower than ANN; R 2 is 23.0% higher than GRU, 24.2% higher than LSTM, and 37.4% higher than ANN. This study provides a new hybrid modeling paradigm for multiphase prediction in shale oil production.

FuelVol. 406
Southwest Petroleum University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Institute of Porous Flow and Fluid Mechanics (CN), Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (CN), Continental (United States) (US), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Gas Technology Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.