Landscape-level effects of local conservation interventions on the abundance and diversity of wild bees in agricultural landscapes of Germany

Abstract To counteract the decline of biodiversity in intensively used agricultural landscapes, a diversity of local conservation interventions, including on-field measures, such as extensification of cereal production, and off-field measures, such as flower strips, is taken. Pollinators, among which wild bees are of particular importance, are a focal group of biodiversity conservation. Although several studies have shown positive local effects of conservation interventions on wild bees, it remains unclear whether these lead to a real increase of wild beess at landscape level. Therefore, we surveyed wild bees in 18 agricultural landscape sections (1 × 1 km) distributed over nine agricultural regions across Germany. In one of the paired landscapes per region, local conservation interventions were implemented, while they were largely absent in the others. We recorded wild bees with a stratified transect sampling on 1000 × 4 m² per landscape where transect sections were distributed proportionally across the edges of all major land-cover types. Further, we conducted GIS-based landscape analyses to calculate the area of conservation interventions and additional landscape metrics, e.g., area of semi natural habitats and edge density. Then, we modelled the effects on landscape-level species richness and abundance of wild bees. Thereby, we also grouped bee species by taxonomy and frequency of occurrence. We found that the area of local conservation interventions was positively related to richness and abundance of solitary bees and rare bees. The abundance of bumble bees and frequent wild bees was positively influenced by crop richness or evenness. In contrast, semi-natural habitats and edge density had no significant effects in the studied landscapes. Our results show that local conservation interventions can promote wild bees at landscape level already few years after their implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biodiversity and Conservation
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-025-03183-x
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Landscape-level effects of local conservation interventions on the abundance and diversity of wild bees in agricultural landscapes of Germany

Jens Dauber, Josephine Kulow, Catrin Westphal, J. Thiele
Biodiversity and Conservation
Plant and animal studies
article

Landscape-level effects of local conservation interventions on the abundance and diversity of wild bees in agricultural landscapes of Germany

Jens Dauber, Josephine Kulow, Catrin Westphal, J. Thiele
article en

Abstract

Abstract To counteract the decline of biodiversity in intensively used agricultural landscapes, a diversity of local conservation interventions, including on-field measures, such as extensification of cereal production, and off-field measures, such as flower strips, is taken. Pollinators, among which wild bees are of particular importance, are a focal group of biodiversity conservation. Although several studies have shown positive local effects of conservation interventions on wild bees, it remains unclear whether these lead to a real increase of wild beess at landscape level. Therefore, we surveyed wild bees in 18 agricultural landscape sections (1 × 1 km) distributed over nine agricultural regions across Germany. In one of the paired landscapes per region, local conservation interventions were implemented, while they were largely absent in the others. We recorded wild bees with a stratified transect sampling on 1000 × 4 m² per landscape where transect sections were distributed proportionally across the edges of all major land-cover types. Further, we conducted GIS-based landscape analyses to calculate the area of conservation interventions and additional landscape metrics, e.g., area of semi natural habitats and edge density. Then, we modelled the effects on landscape-level species richness and abundance of wild bees. Thereby, we also grouped bee species by taxonomy and frequency of occurrence. We found that the area of local conservation interventions was positively related to richness and abundance of solitary bees and rare bees. The abundance of bumble bees and frequent wild bees was positively influenced by crop richness or evenness. In contrast, semi-natural habitats and edge density had no significant effects in the studied landscapes. Our results show that local conservation interventions can promote wild bees at landscape level already few years after their implementation.

Biodiversity and ConservationVol. 34(13)
Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE), University of Göttingen (DE), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft, Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft, Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank, Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.