From dose to decision: IAEA TECDOC-870–based risk modeling of CBCT and practical protocol recommendations

This study evaluates organ-specific radiation doses and cancer risks from Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in head/neck and chest radiotherapy. Using an anthropomorphic phantom and Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters (OSLDs) on a Varian Halcyon™ 2.0 system, two protocols were assessed: head (100 kV, 126 mAs) and thorax fast (125 kV, 270 mAs). Measured mean organ doses were 11.98 mGy (brain), 15.84 mGy (thyroid), 10.16 mGy (heart), and 8.32 mGy (lungs). The EQD2 was highest for the thyroid (17.2 Gy, α/β=3), followed by lungs (9.8 Gy, α/β=10). Sex-specific excess relative risk (ERR) analysis revealed substantial variation, with females exhibiting higher risks. The thyroid (head protocol) showed maximal ERR (79.99% females, 55.79% males), followed by brain (38.99% vs. 22.78%) and thyroid in thoracic scans (40.81% vs. 28.46%). Lung ERR reached 35.90% (females) vs. 12.53% (males), while esophagus and heart risks showed pronounced sex differences. Key findings: (1) significant dose heterogeneity, with thyroid receiving highest exposure, (2) elevated biological risks for late-responding tissues, and (3) consistently greater cancer risks in females. These results highlight the need for protocol optimization through dose reduction and gender-specific considerations in CBCT imaging, balancing quality with safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2025.103949
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From dose to decision: IAEA TECDOC-870–based risk modeling of CBCT and practical protocol recommendations

Oussama Nhila, Y. Berrada, A. Bannan, H. Sekkat et al.
1 citations
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
1.88
article

From dose to decision: IAEA TECDOC-870–based risk modeling of CBCT and practical protocol recommendations

Oussama Nhila, Y. Berrada, A. Bannan, H. Sekkat, A. Khallouqi, A. Halimi, O. El rhazouani, A. Wahji, M. Boulaazaim, O. Elmouden
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates organ-specific radiation doses and cancer risks from Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in head/neck and chest radiotherapy. Using an anthropomorphic phantom and Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters (OSLDs) on a Varian Halcyon™ 2.0 system, two protocols were assessed: head (100 kV, 126 mAs) and thorax fast (125 kV, 270 mAs). Measured mean organ doses were 11.98 mGy (brain), 15.84 mGy (thyroid), 10.16 mGy (heart), and 8.32 mGy (lungs). The EQD2 was highest for the thyroid (17.2 Gy, α/β=3), followed by lungs (9.8 Gy, α/β=10). Sex-specific excess relative risk (ERR) analysis revealed substantial variation, with females exhibiting higher risks. The thyroid (head protocol) showed maximal ERR (79.99% females, 55.79% males), followed by brain (38.99% vs. 22.78%) and thyroid in thoracic scans (40.81% vs. 28.46%). Lung ERR reached 35.90% (females) vs. 12.53% (males), while esophagus and heart risks showed pronounced sex differences. Key findings: (1) significant dose heterogeneity, with thyroid receiving highest exposure, (2) elevated biological risks for late-responding tissues, and (3) consistently greater cancer risks in females. These results highlight the need for protocol optimization through dose reduction and gender-specific considerations in CBCT imaging, balancing quality with safety.

Nuclear Engineering and TechnologyVol. 58(2)
Université Ibn-Tofail (MA), Instituts Supérieurs des Professions Infirmières et Techniques de Santé (MA), Université Hassan 1er (MA), University of Hassan II Casablanca (MA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.