Thermodynamic Modeling and Emission Assessment of Coalbed Methane Utilization in Power Generation: A Case Study from Russia

At present, both in Russia and globally, a variety of methodologies are employed to estimate coalbed methane (CBM) reserves, often leading to considerable discrepancies in reported figures. Additionally, due to the lack of sufficient experience in Russia regarding the development of these resources using field production technologies and, accordingly, the assessment of the technological feasibility of methane extraction, it is crucial to significantly revise the above estimates downward when planning and implementing industrial gas production projects. This study presents a calculation conducted by the authors using the “EBSILON® Professional” program for modeling thermodynamic processes in the energy system, which allowed comparison of energy production from three types of fuel: coal, oil, and gas. During modeling, the fuel consumption was assumed to be 10 kg/sec. Based on this assumption and considering the operating conditions along with other design parameters, the useful power output, total energy, and exergy efficiency, as well as CO2 emission factors (expressed in mgCO2/kWh), were calculated and presented for each type of fuel. The results of the study show that the projected emission estimate for the use of CBM in a combined cycle with natural gas in power plants is the lowest among the three fuels, at 245.35 mgCO2/kWh. Consequently, the use of CBM will lower the energy intensity of technological processes at coal-fired power plants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Modeling & Assessment
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-025-10077-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coal Properties and Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermodynamic Modeling and Emission Assessment of Coalbed Methane Utilization in Power Generation: A Case Study from Russia

A.M. Gonopolsky, Е.А. Mazlova, Vadim Fetisov, Hadi Davardoost et al.
1 citations
Environmental Modeling & Assessment
Coal Properties and Utilization
1.15
article

Thermodynamic Modeling and Emission Assessment of Coalbed Methane Utilization in Power Generation: A Case Study from Russia

A.M. Gonopolsky, Е.А. Mazlova, Vadim Fetisov, Hadi Davardoost, Reza Mosayebi Behbahani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

At present, both in Russia and globally, a variety of methodologies are employed to estimate coalbed methane (CBM) reserves, often leading to considerable discrepancies in reported figures. Additionally, due to the lack of sufficient experience in Russia regarding the development of these resources using field production technologies and, accordingly, the assessment of the technological feasibility of methane extraction, it is crucial to significantly revise the above estimates downward when planning and implementing industrial gas production projects. This study presents a calculation conducted by the authors using the “EBSILON® Professional” program for modeling thermodynamic processes in the energy system, which allowed comparison of energy production from three types of fuel: coal, oil, and gas. During modeling, the fuel consumption was assumed to be 10 kg/sec. Based on this assumption and considering the operating conditions along with other design parameters, the useful power output, total energy, and exergy efficiency, as well as CO2 emission factors (expressed in mgCO2/kWh), were calculated and presented for each type of fuel. The results of the study show that the projected emission estimate for the use of CBM in a combined cycle with natural gas in power plants is the lowest among the three fuels, at 245.35 mgCO2/kWh. Consequently, the use of CBM will lower the energy intensity of technological processes at coal-fired power plants.

Environmental Modeling & AssessmentVol. 31(1)
Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas (RU), Petroleum University of Technology (IR), Saint Petersburg Mining University (RU), Kaliningrad State Technical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Coal Properties and Utilization
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.