A Study on Crime Victims’ Right to Participate in Criminal Proceedings and the System of State-Appointed Counsel

This study examines the legal and institutional implications of crime victims’ rights to participate in criminal proceedings and the victim counsel system, with a particular focus on the court-appointed counsel system (gukseonbyeonhosa) for victims. It further explores the potential for expansion and improvement of these systems. In line with international criminal policy trends, there has been a shift toward recognizing victims not merely as passive recipients of protection but as active holders of rights. In South Korea, special provisions allowing attorney appointments and the appointment of court-appointed counsel have gradually been introduced and expanded, mainly for victims of certain specified crimes. The analysis reveals that crime victims’ participatory rights in Korea are categorized into two main groups: general rights provided under the Criminal Procedure Act and the Crime Victim Protection Act, and special participatory rights granted to victims of specific crimes under the so-called “Six Special Acts” (Teukrye6beop). The former allows victims to exercise their rights directly or through private counsel, while the latter mandates the exercise of rights through counsel, with court-appointed counsel provided when necessary. However, the current system faces structural limitations, including restricted scope of application, lack of explicit statutory provisions, and insufficient numbers of court-appointed counsel, especially in certain regions. This study proposes the following policy directions: (1) enshrine the legal basis for participatory rights, attorney appointment, and court-appointed counsel in higher- level statutes; (2) design participation criteria based on the severity of harm and the necessity of rights protection rather than on crime categories; (3) expand the pool of court-appointed counsel and enhance their expertise through specialized training and systematic monitoring; and (4) ensure that the protection of victims’ rights does not undermine defendants’ rights to defense or the fairness of criminal proceedings. Ultimately, the expansion of the victim counsel system and the court-appointed counsel system not only strengthens victim protection but also enhances the overall credibility and fairness of the criminal justice process. These reforms are essential for ensuring that victims are recognized not as peripheral figures but as rights-bearing participants in criminal proceedings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Association Of Victimology
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36220/kjv.2025.33.2.123
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on Crime Victims’ Right to Participate in Criminal Proceedings and the System of State-Appointed Counsel

Zaehee Kim
Korean Association Of Victimology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

A Study on Crime Victims’ Right to Participate in Criminal Proceedings and the System of State-Appointed Counsel

Zaehee Kim
article en

Abstract

This study examines the legal and institutional implications of crime victims’ rights to participate in criminal proceedings and the victim counsel system, with a particular focus on the court-appointed counsel system (gukseonbyeonhosa) for victims. It further explores the potential for expansion and improvement of these systems. In line with international criminal policy trends, there has been a shift toward recognizing victims not merely as passive recipients of protection but as active holders of rights. In South Korea, special provisions allowing attorney appointments and the appointment of court-appointed counsel have gradually been introduced and expanded, mainly for victims of certain specified crimes. The analysis reveals that crime victims’ participatory rights in Korea are categorized into two main groups: general rights provided under the Criminal Procedure Act and the Crime Victim Protection Act, and special participatory rights granted to victims of specific crimes under the so-called “Six Special Acts” (Teukrye6beop). The former allows victims to exercise their rights directly or through private counsel, while the latter mandates the exercise of rights through counsel, with court-appointed counsel provided when necessary. However, the current system faces structural limitations, including restricted scope of application, lack of explicit statutory provisions, and insufficient numbers of court-appointed counsel, especially in certain regions. This study proposes the following policy directions: (1) enshrine the legal basis for participatory rights, attorney appointment, and court-appointed counsel in higher- level statutes; (2) design participation criteria based on the severity of harm and the necessity of rights protection rather than on crime categories; (3) expand the pool of court-appointed counsel and enhance their expertise through specialized training and systematic monitoring; and (4) ensure that the protection of victims’ rights does not undermine defendants’ rights to defense or the fairness of criminal proceedings. Ultimately, the expansion of the victim counsel system and the court-appointed counsel system not only strengthens victim protection but also enhances the overall credibility and fairness of the criminal justice process. These reforms are essential for ensuring that victims are recognized not as peripheral figures but as rights-bearing participants in criminal proceedings.

Korean Association Of VictimologyVol. 33(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.