Inertial Potential From the Equivalence Principle

This paper presents an idea to replace special relativity by general relativity applied to an inertial field. The equivalence principle allows us to define an inertial potential equivalent to the gravitational potential. The inertial potential will be further defined using kinetic energy, then the inertial potential will explain the kinematic effect of Hafele-Keating experiment (the experiment where atomic clocks flew around the Earth). A serious problem appeared, independent to replacing special relativity by general relativity. The time reference chosen by Hafele-Keating (above the North Pole) is correct but unjustified. That time reference is in fact local: local meaning above the Earth, contrary to above the Sun. Indeed the rotation of the Earth around the Sun has to be ignored or this would give different results. A previous study reached a similar conclusion. If locality seems crucial, this paper presents the problem but offers no explanation why it should work that way. This question probably has to be solved to reach a better understanding of time and time reference.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Physics Research
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5539/apr.v17n2p120
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inertial Potential From the Equivalence Principle

Francois Danis
Applied Physics Research
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
article

Inertial Potential From the Equivalence Principle

Francois Danis
article en

Abstract

This paper presents an idea to replace special relativity by general relativity applied to an inertial field. The equivalence principle allows us to define an inertial potential equivalent to the gravitational potential. The inertial potential will be further defined using kinetic energy, then the inertial potential will explain the kinematic effect of Hafele-Keating experiment (the experiment where atomic clocks flew around the Earth). A serious problem appeared, independent to replacing special relativity by general relativity. The time reference chosen by Hafele-Keating (above the North Pole) is correct but unjustified. That time reference is in fact local: local meaning above the Earth, contrary to above the Sun. Indeed the rotation of the Earth around the Sun has to be ignored or this would give different results. A previous study reached a similar conclusion. If locality seems crucial, this paper presents the problem but offers no explanation why it should work that way. This question probably has to be solved to reach a better understanding of time and time reference.

Applied Physics ResearchVol. 17(2)
National Physical Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.