Critical Factors Affecting Digital PCR Quantification Accuracy in HBV DNA Reference Material for In Vitro Diagnostics

Digital PCR, as an advanced technique for absolute nucleic acid quantification, has been widely used in the value assignment and characterization of reference materials, including in vitro diagnostic reference standards. However, few studies have systematically evaluated the impact of different digital PCR platforms and nucleic acid extraction kits on the quantification of reference materials. In this study, we established a highly specific and reproducible digital PCR assay for the hepatitis B virus and systematically evaluated the influences of commercial digital PCR platforms, primer-probe sets, and nucleic acid extraction kits on reference materials quantification. Results demonstrated good consistency in quantitative measurements across mainstream commercial digital PCR platforms based on different technical principles, with a mean interplatform coefficient of variation (CV) of 9.05%. Notably, nucleic acid extraction efficiency demonstrated the greatest impact on quantification accuracy, with a mean CV across different extraction kits of 76.66%. Primer-probe design also contributed substantially to the measurement uncertainty. These findings provide important insights that support the standardization of digital PCR protocols for reference materials quantification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c03430
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical Factors Affecting Digital PCR Quantification Accuracy in HBV DNA Reference Material for In Vitro Diagnostics

Xiaotian Hao, Alimire Abulikemu, Pengfei Wang, Liang Li et al.
1 citations
Analytical Chemistry
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
0.67
article

Critical Factors Affecting Digital PCR Quantification Accuracy in HBV DNA Reference Material for In Vitro Diagnostics

Xiaotian Hao, Alimire Abulikemu, Pengfei Wang, Liang Li, Haiwei Zhou, Manyu Li, Zeyu Song, Ning Ma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Digital PCR, as an advanced technique for absolute nucleic acid quantification, has been widely used in the value assignment and characterization of reference materials, including in vitro diagnostic reference standards. However, few studies have systematically evaluated the impact of different digital PCR platforms and nucleic acid extraction kits on the quantification of reference materials. In this study, we established a highly specific and reproducible digital PCR assay for the hepatitis B virus and systematically evaluated the influences of commercial digital PCR platforms, primer-probe sets, and nucleic acid extraction kits on reference materials quantification. Results demonstrated good consistency in quantitative measurements across mainstream commercial digital PCR platforms based on different technical principles, with a mean interplatform coefficient of variation (CV) of 9.05%. Notably, nucleic acid extraction efficiency demonstrated the greatest impact on quantification accuracy, with a mean CV across different extraction kits of 76.66%. Primer-probe design also contributed substantially to the measurement uncertainty. These findings provide important insights that support the standardization of digital PCR protocols for reference materials quantification.

Analytical ChemistryVol. 97(41)
National Medical Products Administration (CN), China Banking Regulatory Commission (CN), Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (GB), Institute for In Vitro Sciences (US), National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Institute of Quality Standards and Testing Technology for Agro Products (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.