Interpreting for All Minds: Synthesising Practices for Cognitively Inclusive Heritage Interpretation

Heritage interpretation’s primary aim is to educate visitors about historical sites, their histories, and their importance for today, which leads to the assumption that heritage interpretation needs to be cognitively inclusive for all visitors despite their educational backgrounds and learning preferences. Based on the theoretical framework, consisting of the research phenomena of inclusive tourism and heritage interpretation and the learning theories of cognitive load theory, schema theory, and Universal Design for Learning, I synthesised six cognitively inclusive heritage interpretation practices. Those practices were evaluated through different examples in semi-structured interviews with interviewees of different educational backgrounds, languages, cultures, and learning preferences. The findings let me restructure the six practices into four main areas of improvement in heritage interpretation, which are holistic structure and simplification, interpretive storytelling, alternative presentation methods, and visitor-centred infrastructure and 21 respective practices for making heritage interpretation more cognitively inclusive. In conclusion, the research suggests that cognitively inclusive practices can make heritage interpretation more accessible and engaging for a wider audience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Matkailututkimus
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33351/mt.163308
Primary Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpreting for All Minds: Synthesising Practices for Cognitively Inclusive Heritage Interpretation

Jolantha Zaus
Matkailututkimus
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
article

Interpreting for All Minds: Synthesising Practices for Cognitively Inclusive Heritage Interpretation

Jolantha Zaus
article en

Abstract

Heritage interpretation’s primary aim is to educate visitors about historical sites, their histories, and their importance for today, which leads to the assumption that heritage interpretation needs to be cognitively inclusive for all visitors despite their educational backgrounds and learning preferences. Based on the theoretical framework, consisting of the research phenomena of inclusive tourism and heritage interpretation and the learning theories of cognitive load theory, schema theory, and Universal Design for Learning, I synthesised six cognitively inclusive heritage interpretation practices. Those practices were evaluated through different examples in semi-structured interviews with interviewees of different educational backgrounds, languages, cultures, and learning preferences. The findings let me restructure the six practices into four main areas of improvement in heritage interpretation, which are holistic structure and simplification, interpretive storytelling, alternative presentation methods, and visitor-centred infrastructure and 21 respective practices for making heritage interpretation more cognitively inclusive. In conclusion, the research suggests that cognitively inclusive practices can make heritage interpretation more accessible and engaging for a wider audience.

MatkailututkimusVol. 21(2)
University of Lapland (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.