A final act of love: The decision-making experience of Malaysian owners electing companion animal euthanasia

Abstract Companion animal owners (CAOs) may resonate with the struggle that life rests on their hands to say yes or no when considering companion animal euthanasia (CAE). This can lead to guilt, doubt, and self-blame, increasing complicated grief risks. In addition, it is common that CAOs experience anticipatory grief during the CAE decision-making process. Studies on CAE are limited in Asia and knowledge about the theoretical or conceptual framework concerning CAE decision-making is also scarce. Consequently, this basic qualitative study aimed to explore the experiences of Malaysian CAOs in electing CAE, regarding the context, process, and outcomes. Six CAOs with CAE decision-making experience from December 2022 to March 2024 were recruited via a purposive sampling method. The participants were then provided with an online semi-structured interview. Based on the thematic analysis data, the core themes encapsulating the experiences of Malaysian CAOs across four phases of CAE decision-making include health concerns of the companion animals, selecting CAE as an option, executing the CAE decision, and evaluating the CAE decision. The findings also revealed that CAE decision-making involves logical assessment and the subconscious emotional responses of CAOs. Notably, the participants affirmed that they did not regret their decision, with half viewing CAE as a final act of love. According to the participants, careful deliberation during the CAE decision-making process and the re-establishment of identity as responsible owners, acting out of love and care for their companion animals, exerted a meaningful influence on their experiences. The findings from this study offer insights for mental health and veterinary professionals in developing strategies to support CAOs considering CAE. Nevertheless, this study excluded CAOs involved in CAE decision-making who ultimately did not select euthanasia, a population that could be considered in future research aiming to develop a conceptual framework or theoretical model of CAE decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human-Animal Interactions
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2025.0046
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A final act of love: The decision-making experience of Malaysian owners electing companion animal euthanasia

Hui Sian Chin, S. Ng, Choon Tian Chang
Human-Animal Interactions
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

A final act of love: The decision-making experience of Malaysian owners electing companion animal euthanasia

Hui Sian Chin, S. Ng, Choon Tian Chang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Companion animal owners (CAOs) may resonate with the struggle that life rests on their hands to say yes or no when considering companion animal euthanasia (CAE). This can lead to guilt, doubt, and self-blame, increasing complicated grief risks. In addition, it is common that CAOs experience anticipatory grief during the CAE decision-making process. Studies on CAE are limited in Asia and knowledge about the theoretical or conceptual framework concerning CAE decision-making is also scarce. Consequently, this basic qualitative study aimed to explore the experiences of Malaysian CAOs in electing CAE, regarding the context, process, and outcomes. Six CAOs with CAE decision-making experience from December 2022 to March 2024 were recruited via a purposive sampling method. The participants were then provided with an online semi-structured interview. Based on the thematic analysis data, the core themes encapsulating the experiences of Malaysian CAOs across four phases of CAE decision-making include health concerns of the companion animals, selecting CAE as an option, executing the CAE decision, and evaluating the CAE decision. The findings also revealed that CAE decision-making involves logical assessment and the subconscious emotional responses of CAOs. Notably, the participants affirmed that they did not regret their decision, with half viewing CAE as a final act of love. According to the participants, careful deliberation during the CAE decision-making process and the re-establishment of identity as responsible owners, acting out of love and care for their companion animals, exerted a meaningful influence on their experiences. The findings from this study offer insights for mental health and veterinary professionals in developing strategies to support CAOs considering CAE. Nevertheless, this study excluded CAOs involved in CAE decision-making who ultimately did not select euthanasia, a population that could be considered in future research aiming to develop a conceptual framework or theoretical model of CAE decision-making.

Human-Animal Interactions
KPJ Ampang Puteri Specialist Hospital (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.