For Crisis Prices and Against Anti-Price Gouging Statutes
Finestone and Kingston (2022) argue that global persistent crises reveal both a new justification for price gouging as well as the need for the creation and regulation of a new category of goods—reserved goods. While I accept the new justification for price gouging, I raise concerns over the creation and regulation of a new category of goods. In particular, I argue that there are conceptual problems with the current distinction of goods – luxury versus essential – so often used in the price gouging literature. Further, I argue that these problems plague the new category of goods as well.
Authors
- E. Wesley F. Peterson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7162-2099)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Business Ethics Journal Review
- Published
- 2025-10-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.12747/j1l03
- Primary Topic
- European Monetary and Fiscal Policies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00