Classifying Cool Dwarfs: Comprehensive Spectral Typing of Field and Peculiar Dwarfs Using Machine Learning

Abstract Low-mass stars and brown dwarfs—spectral types (SpTs) M0 and later—play a significant role in studying stellar and substellar processes and demographics, reaching down to planetary-mass objects. Currently, the classification of these sources remains heavily reliant on visual inspection of spectral features, equivalent width measurements, or narrow/wideband spectral indices. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) methods offer automated approaches for spectral typing, which are becoming increasingly important as large spectroscopic surveys such as Gaia, SDSS, and SPHEREx generate data sets containing millions of spectra. We investigate the application of ML in spectral type classification on low-resolution ( R ∼ 120) near-infrared spectra of M0–T9 dwarfs obtained with the SpeX instrument on the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility. We specifically aim to classify the gravity- and metallicity-dependent subclasses for late-type dwarfs. We used binned fluxes as input features and compared the efficacy of spectral type estimators built using Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine, and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) models. We tested the influence of different normalizations and analyzed the relative importance of different spectral regions for surface gravity and metallicity subclass classification. Our best-performing model (using KNN) classifies 95.5% ± 0.6% of sources to within ±1 SpT, and assigns surface gravity and metallicity subclasses with 89.5% ± 0.9% accuracy. We test the dependence of signal-to-noise ratio on classification accuracy and find sources with SNR ≳60 have ≳95% accuracy. We also find that zy band plays the most prominent role in the RF model, with FeH and TiO having the highest feature importance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adfb7d
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classifying Cool Dwarfs: Comprehensive Spectral Typing of Field and Peculiar Dwarfs Using Machine Learning

Tianxing Zhou, Adam J. Burgasser, William M. J. Best, Christopher A. Theissen et al.
The Astrophysical Journal
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

Classifying Cool Dwarfs: Comprehensive Spectral Typing of Field and Peculiar Dwarfs Using Machine Learning

Tianxing Zhou, Adam J. Burgasser, William M. J. Best, Christopher A. Theissen, Kelle L. Cruz, S. Jean Feeser, L. Z. Zhao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Low-mass stars and brown dwarfs—spectral types (SpTs) M0 and later—play a significant role in studying stellar and substellar processes and demographics, reaching down to planetary-mass objects. Currently, the classification of these sources remains heavily reliant on visual inspection of spectral features, equivalent width measurements, or narrow/wideband spectral indices. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) methods offer automated approaches for spectral typing, which are becoming increasingly important as large spectroscopic surveys such as Gaia, SDSS, and SPHEREx generate data sets containing millions of spectra. We investigate the application of ML in spectral type classification on low-resolution ( R ∼ 120) near-infrared spectra of M0–T9 dwarfs obtained with the SpeX instrument on the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility. We specifically aim to classify the gravity- and metallicity-dependent subclasses for late-type dwarfs. We used binned fluxes as input features and compared the efficacy of spectral type estimators built using Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine, and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) models. We tested the influence of different normalizations and analyzed the relative importance of different spectral regions for surface gravity and metallicity subclass classification. Our best-performing model (using KNN) classifies 95.5% ± 0.6% of sources to within ±1 SpT, and assigns surface gravity and metallicity subclasses with 89.5% ± 0.9% accuracy. We test the dependence of signal-to-noise ratio on classification accuracy and find sources with SNR ≳60 have ≳95% accuracy. We also find that zy band plays the most prominent role in the RF model, with FeH and TiO having the highest feature importance.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 992(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.