Long-Term Outcomes of Pediatric Kidney Transplants From DCD and DBD Donors: A Comparative OPTN Study

We compared the long-term outcomes of pediatric kidney transplants from DCD and DBD donors over a 33-year period in the USA. Data were retrieved and analysed on kidney transplants from deceased donors in paediatric recipients in 1994-2020 from the OPTN. Data were compared between those receiving kidney transplants from DBD and DCD donors. There were 11,071 paediatric kidney transplants from deceased donors including 350 from DCD donors. DCD transplants were more likely to have delayed allograft function (20.1% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in allograft or patient survival between transplants from DBD and DCD donors at 10 years (56% vs. 55%, p = 0.76 and 90% vs. 91%, p = 0.89). We describe the largest cohort of pediatric DCD kidney transplant recipients in the literature. We showed that despite higher rates of delayed allograft function in DCD transplants, long-term outcomes were not significantly different. Kidney transplants from DCD donors are a viable option and should be offered to children comparable to DBD kidneys as their long-term outcomes do not differ. DCD transplantation is illegal in some countries, however, it offers an opportunity to increase the number of transplants for children; this data should be considered in ongoing policy discussions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplant International
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2025.14706
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-Term Outcomes of Pediatric Kidney Transplants From DCD and DBD Donors: A Comparative OPTN Study

Ioannis Loukopoulos, Joe Brierley, Nicos Kessaris, Jelena Stojanović et al.
1 citations
Transplant International
Organ Donation and Transplantation
1.88
article

Long-Term Outcomes of Pediatric Kidney Transplants From DCD and DBD Donors: A Comparative OPTN Study

Ioannis Loukopoulos, Joe Brierley, Nicos Kessaris, Jelena Stojanović, Marion J. Siebelink, Alicia Paessler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We compared the long-term outcomes of pediatric kidney transplants from DCD and DBD donors over a 33-year period in the USA. Data were retrieved and analysed on kidney transplants from deceased donors in paediatric recipients in 1994-2020 from the OPTN. Data were compared between those receiving kidney transplants from DBD and DCD donors. There were 11,071 paediatric kidney transplants from deceased donors including 350 from DCD donors. DCD transplants were more likely to have delayed allograft function (20.1% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in allograft or patient survival between transplants from DBD and DCD donors at 10 years (56% vs. 55%, p = 0.76 and 90% vs. 91%, p = 0.89). We describe the largest cohort of pediatric DCD kidney transplant recipients in the literature. We showed that despite higher rates of delayed allograft function in DCD transplants, long-term outcomes were not significantly different. Kidney transplants from DCD donors are a viable option and should be offered to children comparable to DBD kidneys as their long-term outcomes do not differ. DCD transplantation is illegal in some countries, however, it offers an opportunity to increase the number of transplants for children; this data should be considered in ongoing policy discussions.

Transplant InternationalVol. 38
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Institute of Child Health (IN), University College London (GB)
Health Resources and Services Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.