Biosafety standards in cosmetology centers: systematic review of risks, protocols, and international compliance.

Biosafety in cosmetology centers is a growing challenge due to the diversity of biological, chemical, and environmental risks that converge in these spaces. This systematic review compiled 19 studies published between 2008 and 2025 to analyze compliance with standards, waste management, the use of protective barriers, and the perceptions of users and professionals. The results show marked heterogeneity: while countries such as New Zealand achieve up to 80% compliance with disinfection measures, in Latin American contexts only 27% of establishments have specific areas for hazardous waste. Likewise, it was documented that only 33% of workers in Turkey consistently wore gloves, and that 72% of European consumers relied solely on visible cleanliness, without knowing the internal biosafety protocols. Evidence shows that technological innovations, such as biosafety cabinets or automated autoclaves, significantly reduce microbial load, although their implementation depends on the economic capacity of the centers. In contrast, countries with weak regulatory frameworks maintain high levels of risk for workers and customers. This study provides a comparative analysis with quantitative data that highlights international gaps and raises the need for specific public policies for the beauty sector. It is recommended that future research focus on the effectiveness of adapted manuals, the evaluation of new technologies, and the role of consumers in consolidating safe environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Growing Health.
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59282/jgh2(3)644-655
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biosafety standards in cosmetology centers: systematic review of risks, protocols, and international compliance.

Mirella Narcisa Adum Lípari, Rosmary Sthephanny Rodríguez Delgado
Journal Growing Health.
Animal testing and alternatives
article

Biosafety standards in cosmetology centers: systematic review of risks, protocols, and international compliance.

Mirella Narcisa Adum Lípari, Rosmary Sthephanny Rodríguez Delgado
article en

Abstract

Biosafety in cosmetology centers is a growing challenge due to the diversity of biological, chemical, and environmental risks that converge in these spaces. This systematic review compiled 19 studies published between 2008 and 2025 to analyze compliance with standards, waste management, the use of protective barriers, and the perceptions of users and professionals. The results show marked heterogeneity: while countries such as New Zealand achieve up to 80% compliance with disinfection measures, in Latin American contexts only 27% of establishments have specific areas for hazardous waste. Likewise, it was documented that only 33% of workers in Turkey consistently wore gloves, and that 72% of European consumers relied solely on visible cleanliness, without knowing the internal biosafety protocols. Evidence shows that technological innovations, such as biosafety cabinets or automated autoclaves, significantly reduce microbial load, although their implementation depends on the economic capacity of the centers. In contrast, countries with weak regulatory frameworks maintain high levels of risk for workers and customers. This study provides a comparative analysis with quantitative data that highlights international gaps and raises the need for specific public policies for the beauty sector. It is recommended that future research focus on the effectiveness of adapted manuals, the evaluation of new technologies, and the role of consumers in consolidating safe environments.

Journal Growing Health.Vol. 2(3)
Universidad San Gregorio de Portoviejo (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.