Design, Testing and Validation of a Cost Effective and Sustainable Bamboo Prosthetic Foot

This study proposes an approach to design and develop a prosthetic foot using bamboo laminate, a sustainable and cost-effective material. The proposed design method is an alternative to the current prosthetic foot design methods developed mainly for carbon-fiber reinforced polymer. This design solution entails significant economic and environmental costs. The research is structured into three main phases: an experimental campaign to characterize the reference prosthesis and select materials for the prototype; a dimensional design and prototyping phase using the new materials; and finally, a phase dedicated to testing and comparative evaluation of the results. Static tests, conducted in accordance with ISO 22675 on both the bamboo prototype and a commercial reference model, revealed comparable static performance between the two solutions. The laminated bamboo prosthetic foot exhibits a strength-to-weight ratio comparable to that of carbon fiber laminates. Its stiffness deviates by less than 15%, with an 8% reduction in weight and a 7% increase in volume compared to the carbon fiber counterpart. Therefore, these results confirm the feasibility of laminated bamboo as a viable material for prosthetic foot design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prosthesis
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7050124
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design, Testing and Validation of a Cost Effective and Sustainable Bamboo Prosthetic Foot

Emanuele Gruppioni, Mattia Frascio, Matilde Minuto, Luca Baldassari
Prosthesis
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Design, Testing and Validation of a Cost Effective and Sustainable Bamboo Prosthetic Foot

Emanuele Gruppioni, Mattia Frascio, Matilde Minuto, Luca Baldassari
article en

Abstract

This study proposes an approach to design and develop a prosthetic foot using bamboo laminate, a sustainable and cost-effective material. The proposed design method is an alternative to the current prosthetic foot design methods developed mainly for carbon-fiber reinforced polymer. This design solution entails significant economic and environmental costs. The research is structured into three main phases: an experimental campaign to characterize the reference prosthesis and select materials for the prototype; a dimensional design and prototyping phase using the new materials; and finally, a phase dedicated to testing and comparative evaluation of the results. Static tests, conducted in accordance with ISO 22675 on both the bamboo prototype and a commercial reference model, revealed comparable static performance between the two solutions. The laminated bamboo prosthetic foot exhibits a strength-to-weight ratio comparable to that of carbon fiber laminates. Its stiffness deviates by less than 15%, with an 8% reduction in weight and a 7% increase in volume compared to the carbon fiber counterpart. Therefore, these results confirm the feasibility of laminated bamboo as a viable material for prosthetic foot design.

ProsthesisVol. 7(5)
Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro (IT), University of Genoa (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Design, Testing and Validation of a Cost Effective and Sustainable Bamboo Prosthetic Foot — Emanuele Gruppioni, Mattia Frascio, et al. · Prosthesis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS