LLM-Enhanced Semantic Text Segmentation

This study investigates semantic text segmentation enhanced by large language model (LLM) embeddings. We assess how effectively embeddings capture semantic coherence and topic closure by integrating them into both classical clustering algorithms and a modified graph-based methods. In addition, we propose a simple magnetic clustering algorithm as a lightweight baseline. Experiments are conducted across multiple datasets and embedding models, with segmentation quality evaluated using the boundary segmentation metric. Results demonstrate that LLM embeddings improve segmentation accuracy, highlight dataset-specific difficulties, and reveal how contextual window size and embedding choice affect performance. These findings clarify the strengths and limitations of embedding-based approaches to segmentation and provide insights relevant to retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910849
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LLM-Enhanced Semantic Text Segmentation

Kirill Yakunin, Rustam Mussabayev, Alexander Krassovitskiy
Applied Sciences
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

LLM-Enhanced Semantic Text Segmentation

Kirill Yakunin, Rustam Mussabayev, Alexander Krassovitskiy
article en

Abstract

This study investigates semantic text segmentation enhanced by large language model (LLM) embeddings. We assess how effectively embeddings capture semantic coherence and topic closure by integrating them into both classical clustering algorithms and a modified graph-based methods. In addition, we propose a simple magnetic clustering algorithm as a lightweight baseline. Experiments are conducted across multiple datasets and embedding models, with segmentation quality evaluated using the boundary segmentation metric. Results demonstrate that LLM embeddings improve segmentation accuracy, highlight dataset-specific difficulties, and reveal how contextual window size and embedding choice affect performance. These findings clarify the strengths and limitations of embedding-based approaches to segmentation and provide insights relevant to retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).

Applied SciencesVol. 15(19)
Almaty Management University (KZ), Satbayev University (KZ), Institute of Information and Computational Technologies (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.