The Origin of Anatomically Modern Humans in China

Genetic, skeletal, and archaeological studies alike demonstrate that anatomically modern humans originated ~200–150 ka BP in Africa, and this finding cannot be questioned. Over the last 4–5 decades, however, human fossils with undoubtedly modern skeletal markers, dating to 120–40 ka BP, have been discovered in China and Southeast Asia, suggesting that those territories, too, may have been part of the region where H. s. sapiens arose convergently on the basis of H. erectus. An important fact supporting this hypothesis is that a new taxon, Denisovan (informally H. s. denisovan), was established on the basis of the genetic analysis of a bone sample from a phalanx of the fifth finger of a 9–12-year-old girl from Denisova Cave. Also, genetic studies show that all three taxa, African anatomically modern humans, European Neanderthals, and Central Asian Denisovans, had interbred and produced fertile offspring, implying that all these taxa formed an open genetic system with processes such as admixture and assimilation, suggestive of a single species. Based on this conclusion, the following scenario of the origin of H. sapiens sapiens can be proposed: 80–60 ka BP anatomically modern migrants engaged in such processes with H. s. neanderthalensis in Europe, Denisovans in Central Asia, and early anatomically modern descendants of H. erectus (informally H. s. orientalensis) in East and Southeast Asia. The key role in the origin of H. s. sapiens, then, was played by migrants from Africa (informally H. s. africanensis), who were engaged in interbreeding and assimilation with H. s. neanderthalensis, H. s. orientalensis, and H. s. denisovan.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archaeology Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0110.2025.53.3.107-130
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Origin of Anatomically Modern Humans in China

А. П. Деревянко
1 citations
Archaeology Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
8.27
article

The Origin of Anatomically Modern Humans in China

А. П. Деревянко
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Genetic, skeletal, and archaeological studies alike demonstrate that anatomically modern humans originated ~200–150 ka BP in Africa, and this finding cannot be questioned. Over the last 4–5 decades, however, human fossils with undoubtedly modern skeletal markers, dating to 120–40 ka BP, have been discovered in China and Southeast Asia, suggesting that those territories, too, may have been part of the region where H. s. sapiens arose convergently on the basis of H. erectus. An important fact supporting this hypothesis is that a new taxon, Denisovan (informally H. s. denisovan), was established on the basis of the genetic analysis of a bone sample from a phalanx of the fifth finger of a 9–12-year-old girl from Denisova Cave. Also, genetic studies show that all three taxa, African anatomically modern humans, European Neanderthals, and Central Asian Denisovans, had interbred and produced fertile offspring, implying that all these taxa formed an open genetic system with processes such as admixture and assimilation, suggestive of a single species. Based on this conclusion, the following scenario of the origin of H. sapiens sapiens can be proposed: 80–60 ka BP anatomically modern migrants engaged in such processes with H. s. neanderthalensis in Europe, Denisovans in Central Asia, and early anatomically modern descendants of H. erectus (informally H. s. orientalensis) in East and Southeast Asia. The key role in the origin of H. s. sapiens, then, was played by migrants from Africa (informally H. s. africanensis), who were engaged in interbreeding and assimilation with H. s. neanderthalensis, H. s. orientalensis, and H. s. denisovan.

Archaeology Ethnology and Anthropology of EurasiaVol. 53(3)
Institute of Archaeology (RU), Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
8.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.