Comparison between the maxillary and mandibular permanent dentition of humans and domestic animals

Introduction: Anatomy is the science that studies the shape, architecture, and structure of living beings, with the branch that explores morphological differences between species being termed comparative anatomy. Among the structures comprising the axial skeleton, teeth stand out. Objetive: To compare the teeth in humans and domestic animals (dogs, horses, and cattle), while also highlighting the structural similarities across these distinct species in terms of quantity, functions, and shapes. Methodology: Skeletons and individual anatomical pieces from the Laboratory of Human and Veterinary Anatomy at the University of Franca (UNIFRAN - Franca, SP) were used, as well as renowned anatomy books in this specialty area and scientific articles. Results and conclusion: The results were presented descriptively. In terms of quantity, humans possess 32 permanent dental elements, similar to cattle; dogs have 42, and horses have between 34 and 38, all composed of crown, neck, and root. Cattle lack maxillary incisors and canines, and mares may not have canine teeth. Across the various species analyzed, dental elements exhibited differences in sizes, shapes, and quantities of roots. In all studied species, permanent dental elements are responsible for grasping, tearing, and grinding food; additionally, in some animal species, they are used for self-defense, while in humans, they directly influence facial aesthetics and speech. Based on the results obtained, it is acknowledged that anatomical morphological similarities and differences among dental elements may be related to the functional and evolutionary aspects of the different species studied.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conexão Ciência (Online)
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24862/cco.v20i3.2143
Primary Topic
dental development and anomalies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison between the maxillary and mandibular permanent dentition of humans and domestic animals

Lucas de Freitas Pereira, Luís Gustavo Gosüen Gonçalves Dias, Marcela Aldrovani, Vinícius Thomaz da Silva Almeida et al.
Conexão Ciência (Online)
dental development and anomalies
article

Comparison between the maxillary and mandibular permanent dentition of humans and domestic animals

Lucas de Freitas Pereira, Luís Gustavo Gosüen Gonçalves Dias, Marcela Aldrovani, Vinícius Thomaz da Silva Almeida, Taís Harumi de Castro Sasahara, Fernanda Gosuen Gonçalves Dias, Carolaine Oliveira Alvarenga, D Souza, Adonis Ricardo Oliveira Faleiros
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Anatomy is the science that studies the shape, architecture, and structure of living beings, with the branch that explores morphological differences between species being termed comparative anatomy. Among the structures comprising the axial skeleton, teeth stand out. Objetive: To compare the teeth in humans and domestic animals (dogs, horses, and cattle), while also highlighting the structural similarities across these distinct species in terms of quantity, functions, and shapes. Methodology: Skeletons and individual anatomical pieces from the Laboratory of Human and Veterinary Anatomy at the University of Franca (UNIFRAN - Franca, SP) were used, as well as renowned anatomy books in this specialty area and scientific articles. Results and conclusion: The results were presented descriptively. In terms of quantity, humans possess 32 permanent dental elements, similar to cattle; dogs have 42, and horses have between 34 and 38, all composed of crown, neck, and root. Cattle lack maxillary incisors and canines, and mares may not have canine teeth. Across the various species analyzed, dental elements exhibited differences in sizes, shapes, and quantities of roots. In all studied species, permanent dental elements are responsible for grasping, tearing, and grinding food; additionally, in some animal species, they are used for self-defense, while in humans, they directly influence facial aesthetics and speech. Based on the results obtained, it is acknowledged that anatomical morphological similarities and differences among dental elements may be related to the functional and evolutionary aspects of the different species studied.

Conexão Ciência (Online)Vol. 20(3)
Universidade de Franca (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
dental development and anomalies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.