Exploring radiomic and topological features to evaluate treatment response in rectal cancer

<i>Objective.</i>This study investigates the potential of topological data analysis (TDA) in conjunction with conventional radiomics applied to longitudinal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate treatment response following neoadjuvant therapy, with or without anti-CD40 immunotherapy, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.<i>Approach.</i>Paired pre- and post-treatment MRIs from 21 patients enrolled in the INNATE trial (NCT04130854) were analyzed, including Arm1 (radiation, chemotherapy, and anti-CD40 immunotherapy;<i>n</i>= 12) and Arm2 (radiation and chemotherapy alone;<i>n</i>= 9). Patients were categorized as having a maximal response (MR) or a partial response (PR). Three complementary delta-based analyses were performed: (1) 3D radiomics, (2) 2D radiomics and sliding-windows analysis, and (3) topological feature extraction via TDA. Statistical analysis included cross-arm comparisons (Arm1 vs Arm2), response-based comparisons (MR vs PR), and detailed pairwise subgroup analyses.<i>Main results.</i>For 3D radiomic features, ΔVolume effectively distinguishes between treatment strategies, with Arm1 exhibiting greater tumor reduction compared to Arm2. ΔElongation differentiates between response groups, with MR showing negative values indicative of increased tumor sphericity. In 2D radiomic analysis, Gray-level-dependence -matrix texture features computed across varying sliding windows differentiate between treatment arms but not response groups. Topological analysis identified six features derived from Betti numbers and persistence lifetimes, capturing local heterogeneity in tumor texture, shape and filtration patterns. Among these, five features significantly differentiate response groups, while one distinguishes treatment arms. At a finer level of subgroup comparison, ΔBetti<sub>2</sub>demonstrates significant differences, distinguishing MR-Arm1 vs PR-Arm1 and MR-Arm1 vs MR-Arm2.<i>Significance.</i>This exploratory study suggests potential of topological features for outcome prediction in rectal cancer. These features may complement standard radiomics to enhance predictive performance as more data becomes available. Notably, the ability of topological features to distinguish maximal responders across treatment arms-with and without immunotherapy-may offer additional biological insights, potentially related to immune-mediated tumor response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae117f
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring radiomic and topological features to evaluate treatment response in rectal cancer

Nina Niu Sanford, Steve Jiang, Jiaqi Liu, Hao Peng et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Exploring radiomic and topological features to evaluate treatment response in rectal cancer

Nina Niu Sanford, Steve Jiang, Jiaqi Liu, Hao Peng, Todd A. Aguilera, Gaurav Khatri, Naveen Rajamohan, Haozhao Zhang, Robert D Timmerman, Satwik Rajaram, Alejandra Rodrı́guez
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>This study investigates the potential of topological data analysis (TDA) in conjunction with conventional radiomics applied to longitudinal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate treatment response following neoadjuvant therapy, with or without anti-CD40 immunotherapy, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.<i>Approach.</i>Paired pre- and post-treatment MRIs from 21 patients enrolled in the INNATE trial (NCT04130854) were analyzed, including Arm1 (radiation, chemotherapy, and anti-CD40 immunotherapy;<i>n</i>= 12) and Arm2 (radiation and chemotherapy alone;<i>n</i>= 9). Patients were categorized as having a maximal response (MR) or a partial response (PR). Three complementary delta-based analyses were performed: (1) 3D radiomics, (2) 2D radiomics and sliding-windows analysis, and (3) topological feature extraction via TDA. Statistical analysis included cross-arm comparisons (Arm1 vs Arm2), response-based comparisons (MR vs PR), and detailed pairwise subgroup analyses.<i>Main results.</i>For 3D radiomic features, ΔVolume effectively distinguishes between treatment strategies, with Arm1 exhibiting greater tumor reduction compared to Arm2. ΔElongation differentiates between response groups, with MR showing negative values indicative of increased tumor sphericity. In 2D radiomic analysis, Gray-level-dependence -matrix texture features computed across varying sliding windows differentiate between treatment arms but not response groups. Topological analysis identified six features derived from Betti numbers and persistence lifetimes, capturing local heterogeneity in tumor texture, shape and filtration patterns. Among these, five features significantly differentiate response groups, while one distinguishes treatment arms. At a finer level of subgroup comparison, ΔBetti<sub>2</sub>demonstrates significant differences, distinguishing MR-Arm1 vs PR-Arm1 and MR-Arm1 vs MR-Arm2.<i>Significance.</i>This exploratory study suggests potential of topological features for outcome prediction in rectal cancer. These features may complement standard radiomics to enhance predictive performance as more data becomes available. Notably, the ability of topological features to distinguish maximal responders across treatment arms-with and without immunotherapy-may offer additional biological insights, potentially related to immune-mediated tumor response.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(21)
Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.