The Steenrod squares via unordered joins

The Steenrod squares are cohomology operations with important applications in algebraic topology. While these operations are well-understood classically, little is known about them in the setting of homotopy type theory. Although a definition of the Steenrod squares was put forward by Brunerie (2017), proofs of their characterising properties have remained elusive. In this paper, we revisit Brunerie’s definition and provide proofs of these properties, including stability, Cartan’s formula and the Adem relations. This is done by studying a higher inductive type called the unordered join. This approach is inherently synthetic and, consequently, many of our proofs differ significantly from their classical counterparts. Along the way, we discuss upshots and limitations of homotopy type theory as a synthetic language for homotopy theory. The paper is accompanied by a computer formalisation in Cubical Agda.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lics65433.2025.00029
Primary Topic
Mathematics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Steenrod squares via unordered joins

David Wärn, Axel Ljungström
Mathematics and Applications
article

The Steenrod squares via unordered joins

David Wärn, Axel Ljungström
article en

Abstract

The Steenrod squares are cohomology operations with important applications in algebraic topology. While these operations are well-understood classically, little is known about them in the setting of homotopy type theory. Although a definition of the Steenrod squares was put forward by Brunerie (2017), proofs of their characterising properties have remained elusive. In this paper, we revisit Brunerie’s definition and provide proofs of these properties, including stability, Cartan’s formula and the Adem relations. This is done by studying a higher inductive type called the unordered join. This approach is inherently synthetic and, consequently, many of our proofs differ significantly from their classical counterparts. Along the way, we discuss upshots and limitations of homotopy type theory as a synthetic language for homotopy theory. The paper is accompanied by a computer formalisation in Cubical Agda.

Stockholm University (SE), Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Mathematics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.