Diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT-4 in light of data derived from patient’s clinical and imaging findings in gastrointestinal surgery

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of Methods: 231 GIS cases from between October 1 2021 and January 10 2024 were sourced from the International Journal of Surgery Case Rep ChatGPT-4 was used to generate diagnoses based on the patient's medical histories and categorized by anatomical location (esophagus, gastric, Results: ChatGPT-4 generated 2-10 differential diagnoses per case (median: 5, mean: 4.81.gender, or the number of differential diagnoses (p=0.687 and p=0.862).A significant difference was found between anatomical localizations according to the urgency of the cases (p<0.001).Overall, ChatG final diagnoses (p<0.001 and p=0.035).During the trained period, accuracy was 82.9% (differential) and 59.1% (final), while period it was 83.6% (differential) and 52.2% (final). Conclusion:In this large-scale, case-based evaluation, ChatGPT (DA 83.1%) compared to establishing final diagnoses (DA 57.1%).Diagnostic accuracy was slightly final diagnoses (59.1% vs. 52.2%).These findings indicate that ChatGPT diagnostic stage by broadening the differential diagnosis li into practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Human Health
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29228/ejhh.82956
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT-4 in light of data derived from patient’s clinical and imaging findings in gastrointestinal surgery

Süleyman Orman
European Journal of Human Health
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT-4 in light of data derived from patient’s clinical and imaging findings in gastrointestinal surgery

Süleyman Orman
article en

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of Methods: 231 GIS cases from between October 1 2021 and January 10 2024 were sourced from the International Journal of Surgery Case Rep ChatGPT-4 was used to generate diagnoses based on the patient's medical histories and categorized by anatomical location (esophagus, gastric, Results: ChatGPT-4 generated 2-10 differential diagnoses per case (median: 5, mean: 4.81.gender, or the number of differential diagnoses (p=0.687 and p=0.862).A significant difference was found between anatomical localizations according to the urgency of the cases (p<0.001).Overall, ChatG final diagnoses (p<0.001 and p=0.035).During the trained period, accuracy was 82.9% (differential) and 59.1% (final), while period it was 83.6% (differential) and 52.2% (final). Conclusion:In this large-scale, case-based evaluation, ChatGPT (DA 83.1%) compared to establishing final diagnoses (DA 57.1%).Diagnostic accuracy was slightly final diagnoses (59.1% vs. 52.2%).These findings indicate that ChatGPT diagnostic stage by broadening the differential diagnosis li into practice.

European Journal of Human HealthVol. 3(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT-4 in light of data derived from patient’s clinical and imaging findings in gastrointestinal surgery — Süleyman Orman · European Journal of Human Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS