Representing Data Structures with Invariants in Haskell: The Cases of BST and AVL

Invariants are an essential aspect to take into account for the correct implementation of data structures and their operations. This paper explores how to encode and enforce invariants at type level in Haskell, using Binary Search Trees (BSTs) and AVL trees as case studies. This means the encoding of invariants at type level using advanced features of Haskell type system and their later verification by the type checker. We compare three approaches for the type-level encoding of invariants: fully externalist, externalist, and internalist, each offering a different balance between modularity, safety, and complexity. We also show how to systematically extract standard implementations from correct, invariant-based code.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3759538.3759652
Primary Topic
Logic, programming, and type systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representing Data Structures with Invariants in Haskell: The Cases of BST and AVL

Marcos Viera, Nuria Cobo-Losey Rodríguez, Alberto Pardo
Logic, programming, and type systems
article

Representing Data Structures with Invariants in Haskell: The Cases of BST and AVL

Marcos Viera, Nuria Cobo-Losey Rodríguez, Alberto Pardo
article en

Abstract

Invariants are an essential aspect to take into account for the correct implementation of data structures and their operations. This paper explores how to encode and enforce invariants at type level in Haskell, using Binary Search Trees (BSTs) and AVL trees as case studies. This means the encoding of invariants at type level using advanced features of Haskell type system and their later verification by the type checker. We compare three approaches for the type-level encoding of invariants: fully externalist, externalist, and internalist, each offering a different balance between modularity, safety, and complexity. We also show how to systematically extract standard implementations from correct, invariant-based code.

Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Logic, programming, and type systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.