Measuring Sustainability Under Uncertainty: Introducing Net ESG (N‐ESG) Performance

ABSTRACT This study examines the reliability of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores in uncertain environments by introducing a new indicator, Net ESG (N‐ESG), for the first time. This new index was calculated by subtracting a new ESG‐based sustainability uncertainty index (ESGUI) from ESG scores. This study employed Pedroni (2004) and Westerlund (2007) tests, as well as the DOLS method, for 12 developed countries from 2002 to 2020. It analyzed the impact of economic, geopolitical, climate, and energy price‐related uncertainties on both ESG and N‐ESG through eight different models. Empirical findings indicate that a 1% change in CPU, GPR, EPU, and OPU indices increases ESG by 0.048, 0.355, 0.111, and 0.044 units, respectively, while the same rate of change decreases N‐ESG by −6.501, −18.756, −8.972, and −8.193 units, respectively. These results can be interpreted as ESG scores may not fully reflect the “true” performance of companies in times of uncertainty, while N‐ESG provides a more accurate representation of sustainability practices. These results suggest that policymakers should focus their sustainability policies not only on increasing ESG scores but also on preserving the true value of ESG by reducing uncertainty effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70246
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Sustainability Under Uncertainty: Introducing Net ESG (N‐ESG) Performance

İlyas Kays İMAMOĞLU, Cem Işık, Rahman Aydın, Rafael Alvarado et al.
8 citations
Business Strategy and the Environment
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
25.05
article

Measuring Sustainability Under Uncertainty: Introducing Net ESG (N‐ESG) Performance

İlyas Kays İMAMOĞLU, Cem Işık, Rahman Aydın, Rafael Alvarado, Munir Ahmad, Serdar Ongan
article en
8 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the reliability of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores in uncertain environments by introducing a new indicator, Net ESG (N‐ESG), for the first time. This new index was calculated by subtracting a new ESG‐based sustainability uncertainty index (ESGUI) from ESG scores. This study employed Pedroni (2004) and Westerlund (2007) tests, as well as the DOLS method, for 12 developed countries from 2002 to 2020. It analyzed the impact of economic, geopolitical, climate, and energy price‐related uncertainties on both ESG and N‐ESG through eight different models. Empirical findings indicate that a 1% change in CPU, GPR, EPU, and OPU indices increases ESG by 0.048, 0.355, 0.111, and 0.044 units, respectively, while the same rate of change decreases N‐ESG by −6.501, −18.756, −8.972, and −8.193 units, respectively. These results can be interpreted as ESG scores may not fully reflect the “true” performance of companies in times of uncertainty, while N‐ESG provides a more accurate representation of sustainability practices. These results suggest that policymakers should focus their sustainability policies not only on increasing ESG scores but also on preserving the true value of ESG by reducing uncertainty effects.

Business Strategy and the EnvironmentVol. 35(2)
Ningbo University (CN), Anadolu University (TR), Bayburt University (TR), Erzurum Technical University (TR), Western Caspian University (AZ), Universidad Espíritu Santo (EC), Azerbaijan State University of Economics (AZ), Eskişehir City Hospital (TR), AdventHealth Tampa (US), ILMA University (PK), Korea University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
25.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.