Regierungsbildung 2025: Ein holpriger Weg zur „Arbeitskoalition“ im Bund

After the break-up of the traffic light coalition in November 2025, the question of confidence was used to bring about early general elections. Mathematically and politically, the results allowed only for a coalition between the CDU/CSU and the SPD. The Union parties had formulated expectations for rapid government formation based on a shorter and dynamic coalition agreement. But the negotiations were led based on the routines that have been established over the past decades: in a horizontally and vertically differentiated structure, exploratory talks, a main negotiation group and numerous working groups, almost 300 politicians, mostly from the federal and state levels were directly involved. In a multi-step process, they negotiated a detailed coalition treaty that stipulated the political plans for the new government, its structure and the coordination procedures in parliament and government. That the Christian Democrat Friedrich Merz did not receive the required majority in the first round of chancellor elections in the Bundestag showed that potential for conflict remains in the new coalition. The structure of the ministries – and the committee structure in Parliament that mirrors it – saw numerous adjustments. Notably, a new ministry for digital affairs and modernization of the state was formed. All in all, the government formation process showed strong continuity in formalizing the informal.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5771/0340-1758-2025-3-645
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regierungsbildung 2025: Ein holpriger Weg zur „Arbeitskoalition“ im Bund

Sven T. Siefken
Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Regierungsbildung 2025: Ein holpriger Weg zur „Arbeitskoalition“ im Bund

Sven T. Siefken
article en

Abstract

After the break-up of the traffic light coalition in November 2025, the question of confidence was used to bring about early general elections. Mathematically and politically, the results allowed only for a coalition between the CDU/CSU and the SPD. The Union parties had formulated expectations for rapid government formation based on a shorter and dynamic coalition agreement. But the negotiations were led based on the routines that have been established over the past decades: in a horizontally and vertically differentiated structure, exploratory talks, a main negotiation group and numerous working groups, almost 300 politicians, mostly from the federal and state levels were directly involved. In a multi-step process, they negotiated a detailed coalition treaty that stipulated the political plans for the new government, its structure and the coordination procedures in parliament and government. That the Christian Democrat Friedrich Merz did not receive the required majority in the first round of chancellor elections in the Bundestag showed that potential for conflict remains in the new coalition. The structure of the ministries – and the committee structure in Parliament that mirrors it – saw numerous adjustments. Notably, a new ministry for digital affairs and modernization of the state was formed. All in all, the government formation process showed strong continuity in formalizing the informal.

Zeitschrift für ParlamentsfragenVol. 56(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.