Generative AI and Human Advice: User Perceptions, Intentions, and Behavior Across Pre-visit and On-site Travel Stages

This research explores users’ preferences for human versus Generative Artificial Intelligence at specific stages of the information search process. Through three experiments, we investigate how the source of recommendation – Generative Artificial Intelligence versus Human—shapes user perceptions, intentions, and behaviors. Study 1 shows users favor human providers in terms of perceived information quality, usage intention, and advocacy intentions. Study 2 demonstrates that this preference exists only in pre-visit stages, with no differences for on-site information search (except in willingness to follow recommendations). Study 3 shows that participants are more likely to post positive reviews about human providers pre-visit, with no difference on-site. While previous research has conceptually explored ChatGPT’s role in travel decision-making, our empirical evidence shows that acceptance and advocacy toward Generative Artificial Intelligence technologies shift according to the travel stage, providing valuable insights for tourism information providers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Travel Research
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875251364222
Citations
2
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI and Human Advice: User Perceptions, Intentions, and Behavior Across Pre-visit and On-site Travel Stages

Ilaria Curina, Barbara Francioni, Raffaele Filieri, Marco Cioppi et al.
2 citations
Journal of Travel Research
AI in Service Interactions
4.96
article

Generative AI and Human Advice: User Perceptions, Intentions, and Behavior Across Pre-visit and On-site Travel Stages

Ilaria Curina, Barbara Francioni, Raffaele Filieri, Marco Cioppi, Mauro Dini, Roberta De Cicco
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This research explores users’ preferences for human versus Generative Artificial Intelligence at specific stages of the information search process. Through three experiments, we investigate how the source of recommendation – Generative Artificial Intelligence versus Human—shapes user perceptions, intentions, and behaviors. Study 1 shows users favor human providers in terms of perceived information quality, usage intention, and advocacy intentions. Study 2 demonstrates that this preference exists only in pre-visit stages, with no differences for on-site information search (except in willingness to follow recommendations). Study 3 shows that participants are more likely to post positive reviews about human providers pre-visit, with no difference on-site. While previous research has conceptually explored ChatGPT’s role in travel decision-making, our empirical evidence shows that acceptance and advocacy toward Generative Artificial Intelligence technologies shift according to the travel stage, providing valuable insights for tourism information providers.

Journal of Travel Research
Audencia Business School (FR), University of Urbino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
AI in Service Interactions
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.