Measuring Passengers’ Comfort and Perceived Safety in Automated Driving: Good Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities

Passenger comfort and perceived safety, as two psychological states, are crucial for user acceptance of automated driving. The accurate measurement of these passenger states contributes to human-centred designs for automated vehicles and developing predictive models for providing personalised settings. However, practical challenges and best practices are rarely discussed in the literature. This workshop aims to address this gap by creating a forum to synthesise current practices and explore novel, effective measurement approaches. The session includes expert talks on subjective, objective, and model-based measurement methodologies, and interactive breakout sessions. Participants will critically evaluate existing methodologies and design future multi-modal strategies, including incorporating artificial intelligence (AI). The workshop will produce numerous outcomes, including the collaborative development of a research outlook and a methodological paper for knowledge sharing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3744335.3749142
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Passengers’ Comfort and Perceived Safety in Automated Driving: Good Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities

Natasha Merat, Pavlo Bazilinskyy, Chen Peng, Yueteng Yu
1 citations
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
article

Measuring Passengers’ Comfort and Perceived Safety in Automated Driving: Good Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities

Natasha Merat, Pavlo Bazilinskyy, Chen Peng, Yueteng Yu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Passenger comfort and perceived safety, as two psychological states, are crucial for user acceptance of automated driving. The accurate measurement of these passenger states contributes to human-centred designs for automated vehicles and developing predictive models for providing personalised settings. However, practical challenges and best practices are rarely discussed in the literature. This workshop aims to address this gap by creating a forum to synthesise current practices and explore novel, effective measurement approaches. The session includes expert talks on subjective, objective, and model-based measurement methodologies, and interactive breakout sessions. Participants will critically evaluate existing methodologies and design future multi-modal strategies, including incorporating artificial intelligence (AI). The workshop will produce numerous outcomes, including the collaborative development of a research outlook and a methodological paper for knowledge sharing.

University of Leeds (GB), Queensland University of Technology (AU), Human Factors (Norway) (NO), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.