When and How to Explain: Designing Human-Machine Interfaces for Pilotless Urban Air Mobility

Urban Air Mobility (UAM) is expected to operate without onboard pilots, raising concerns about passenger trust in automation. Building on findings from autonomous vehicle (AV) research, this study investigates whether explanation-based human-machine interfaces (HMIs) can enhance trust in UAM. We developed a virtual simulation with five conditions, varying the type (how vs. how+why) and timing (pre-event vs. post-event) of system-generated explanations. A baseline condition with no explanation was also included. Participants will experience multiple UAM issue events (e.g., fog, gusts), during which trust, transparency, and competence are measured. We anticipate that both how and why explanations will increase trust, with why and pre-event explanations expected to have stronger effects. Our findings will inform the design of explainable UAM systems that foster psychological comfort and acceptance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3744335.3756859
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When and How to Explain: Designing Human-Machine Interfaces for Pilotless Urban Air Mobility

Young Woo Kim, Siyoung Kim, Jong-woo Park
1 citations
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
article

When and How to Explain: Designing Human-Machine Interfaces for Pilotless Urban Air Mobility

Young Woo Kim, Siyoung Kim, Jong-woo Park
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Urban Air Mobility (UAM) is expected to operate without onboard pilots, raising concerns about passenger trust in automation. Building on findings from autonomous vehicle (AV) research, this study investigates whether explanation-based human-machine interfaces (HMIs) can enhance trust in UAM. We developed a virtual simulation with five conditions, varying the type (how vs. how+why) and timing (pre-event vs. post-event) of system-generated explanations. A baseline condition with no explanation was also included. Participants will experience multiple UAM issue events (e.g., fog, gusts), during which trust, transparency, and competence are measured. We anticipate that both how and why explanations will increase trust, with why and pre-event explanations expected to have stronger effects. Our findings will inform the design of explainable UAM systems that foster psychological comfort and acceptance.

Gyeongsang National University (KR), Yonsei University (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When and How to Explain: Designing Human-Machine Interfaces for Pilotless Urban Air Mobility — Young Woo Kim, Siyoung Kim, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS