Comparison Of The Rational Concepts Of The Philosopher Ibn Bajjah And The Philosopher Aristotle

This article is a comparative study that seeks to identify the differences, similarities and implications between Aristotle and Ibn Bajjah's concept of the perfect human being. The main source used as a reference in the study is the book Tadbir Al-Mutawahhid which is the work of Ibn Bajjah Nichomachean Ethic which is the work of Aristotle. Meanwhile, secondary sources are taken from various sources such as books, magazines and also articles that are in accordance with this research. Primary and secondary data are studied through historical and philosophical analysis (understanding and interpretation methods). The results of this study show that the concept of happiness according to Aristotle, happiness is the act of coexistence in harmony between the soul and the perfect virtue, happiness is experienced by a person when receiving pleasure (achievement), which is followed by the process of self-development in wanting and becoming something. while Ibn Bajjah said that happiness is the peak or end of all human goodness, so that the highest good can be achieved if a person can meet his physical and spiritual needs. And there is also the similarity of Aristotle and Ibn Bajjah's opinion about man, both agree that the goal of happiness is the first step towards happiness by doing good deeds with the help of reason, and the main idea is that Aristotle and Ibn Bajjah discuss metaphysics. The difference between Ibn Bajjah and Aristotle is that Aristotle includes the path to happiness, namely human goals, seeking as many blessings as possible, wisdom and rationality, while the path to happiness of Ibn Bajjah includes self-knowledge, the knowledge of Allah, the knowledge of the hereafter. and appreciation for the world. The implication of this research is that compared to today's life, we focus too much on worldly interests and end up forgetting about the problems of the hereafter and facing the challenges of increasingly modern technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AJIRSS Asian Journal of Innovative Research in Social Science
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53866/ajirss.v4i2.1027
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Of The Rational Concepts Of The Philosopher Ibn Bajjah And The Philosopher Aristotle

Angela Angela
AJIRSS Asian Journal of Innovative Research in Social Science
Education and Islamic Studies
article

Comparison Of The Rational Concepts Of The Philosopher Ibn Bajjah And The Philosopher Aristotle

Angela Angela
article en

Abstract

This article is a comparative study that seeks to identify the differences, similarities and implications between Aristotle and Ibn Bajjah's concept of the perfect human being. The main source used as a reference in the study is the book Tadbir Al-Mutawahhid which is the work of Ibn Bajjah Nichomachean Ethic which is the work of Aristotle. Meanwhile, secondary sources are taken from various sources such as books, magazines and also articles that are in accordance with this research. Primary and secondary data are studied through historical and philosophical analysis (understanding and interpretation methods). The results of this study show that the concept of happiness according to Aristotle, happiness is the act of coexistence in harmony between the soul and the perfect virtue, happiness is experienced by a person when receiving pleasure (achievement), which is followed by the process of self-development in wanting and becoming something. while Ibn Bajjah said that happiness is the peak or end of all human goodness, so that the highest good can be achieved if a person can meet his physical and spiritual needs. And there is also the similarity of Aristotle and Ibn Bajjah's opinion about man, both agree that the goal of happiness is the first step towards happiness by doing good deeds with the help of reason, and the main idea is that Aristotle and Ibn Bajjah discuss metaphysics. The difference between Ibn Bajjah and Aristotle is that Aristotle includes the path to happiness, namely human goals, seeking as many blessings as possible, wisdom and rationality, while the path to happiness of Ibn Bajjah includes self-knowledge, the knowledge of Allah, the knowledge of the hereafter. and appreciation for the world. The implication of this research is that compared to today's life, we focus too much on worldly interests and end up forgetting about the problems of the hereafter and facing the challenges of increasingly modern technology.

AJIRSS Asian Journal of Innovative Research in Social ScienceVol. 4(2)
Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Education and Islamic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.