Perception and practices towards the use of social networking sites and artificial intelligence for academic purposes among postgraduate students in various health science courses in South India

Background.Social networking sites (SNSs) provide postgraduate students with numerous opportunities for educational networking in their field of specialization.Artificial intelligence (AI) is another promising tool that has enhanced the learning experiences of postgraduate students.Despite the various advantages of incorporating these platforms and technologies in postgraduate training in education, research, and patient care, postgraduate students pursuing health science courses have expressed various concerns related to their usage.Objectives.To assess the perceptions and practices of postgraduate students pursuing health science courses regarding the use of SNSs and AI for educational purposes, research, and patient care and to determine their determinants.Material and methods.Data was collected via a self-administered questionnaire designed as a Google form.Results.Of the 204 participants, 153 (75.0%) used SNSs for academic purposes.The most common benefit gained by the users concerning SNSs was faster access to information, whereas the most common drawback stated was a lack of authentic data.158 (77.4%) participants favored its use for postgraduate training.165 (80.9%) participants had used AI tools for academic purposes.The most common benefit gained by the users of AI was faster access to information, and the most common drawback was that it limits critical thinking.A total of 166 (81.4%) favored its usage for postgraduate training.100 (49%) participants wanted some form of training in the use of AI applications.Place of residence and type of course were associated with the use of SNSs for academic purposes.Favorable perceptions of using SNSs and AI for academic purposes were associated with the usage of SNSs (p < 0.001) and AI (p = 0.008), respectively, among postgraduate students.Conclusions.At least three-fourths of postgraduate students had used SNSs used SNSs or AI for academic purposes.Favorable perceptions were associated with the use of SNSs and AI.Hence, there is a need to conduct training programs among all health science postgraduate students to give them the right perspective of these platforms and to encourage their usage.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5114/fmpcr.2025.153089
Primary Topic
Dental Research and COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perception and practices towards the use of social networking sites and artificial intelligence for academic purposes among postgraduate students in various health science courses in South India

Ashok K. Tiwary, Harshita Kumari, F. Mohammed, Nitin Joseph et al.
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review
Dental Research and COVID-19
article

Perception and practices towards the use of social networking sites and artificial intelligence for academic purposes among postgraduate students in various health science courses in South India

Ashok K. Tiwary, Harshita Kumari, F. Mohammed, Nitin Joseph, Pragya Pandey, Sathiamoorthy Vineetha, Ananya Sharma, Soumya Tripathi, Pratham Gupta, Adit Neeraj
article en

Abstract

Background.Social networking sites (SNSs) provide postgraduate students with numerous opportunities for educational networking in their field of specialization.Artificial intelligence (AI) is another promising tool that has enhanced the learning experiences of postgraduate students.Despite the various advantages of incorporating these platforms and technologies in postgraduate training in education, research, and patient care, postgraduate students pursuing health science courses have expressed various concerns related to their usage.Objectives.To assess the perceptions and practices of postgraduate students pursuing health science courses regarding the use of SNSs and AI for educational purposes, research, and patient care and to determine their determinants.Material and methods.Data was collected via a self-administered questionnaire designed as a Google form.Results.Of the 204 participants, 153 (75.0%) used SNSs for academic purposes.The most common benefit gained by the users concerning SNSs was faster access to information, whereas the most common drawback stated was a lack of authentic data.158 (77.4%) participants favored its use for postgraduate training.165 (80.9%) participants had used AI tools for academic purposes.The most common benefit gained by the users of AI was faster access to information, and the most common drawback was that it limits critical thinking.A total of 166 (81.4%) favored its usage for postgraduate training.100 (49%) participants wanted some form of training in the use of AI applications.Place of residence and type of course were associated with the use of SNSs for academic purposes.Favorable perceptions of using SNSs and AI for academic purposes were associated with the usage of SNSs (p < 0.001) and AI (p = 0.008), respectively, among postgraduate students.Conclusions.At least three-fourths of postgraduate students had used SNSs used SNSs or AI for academic purposes.Favorable perceptions were associated with the use of SNSs and AI.Hence, there is a need to conduct training programs among all health science postgraduate students to give them the right perspective of these platforms and to encourage their usage.

Family Medicine & Primary Care ReviewVol. 27(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Dental Research and COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.