Lessons from exploring the relationship between livability and biodiversity in the built environment

Urban design and ecology usually operate in silos despite their shared goal of advancing sustainable cities. Livability is predominantly concerned with the quality of the built environment, often neglecting ecological considerations. Conversely, biodiversity focuses on preserving life forms and ecosystem functions, often overlooking the intricacies of the built environment. This disjointed approach limits our understanding of the interactions between these fields and hinders interdisciplinary practice. Our research explores the existing relationships between biodiversity and livability to expand our understanding of the exchanges between the two disciplines, and their combined effect in improving our cities. To achieve this, we employed an expert elicitation method grounded in a heuristic, exploratory, and knowledge-based approach. This methodology enabled us to first deconstruct the broad and often ambiguous concepts of livability and biodiversity into concrete domains, each with its own specific components, and then examine the connections between the two fields in the urban environment. The results of this study reveal that although urban designers and ecologists approach the concepts of livability and biodiversity through strict disciplinary lenses, the two share significant areas of interaction. Our findings indicate that biodiversity acts as a hidden driver of livability. Functional Diversity emerges as a key domain of biodiversity, impacting domains of livability such as Comfort, and Sense of Place. Conversely, specific livability components such as Environmental Hazards Mitigation, Maintenance, Civic and Social Involvement, and Infrastructure Accessibility have the biggest impact on biodiversity across all domains. • Urban biodiversity is a hidden driver of livability. • Sense of place, comfort, and safety are closely tied to key biodiversity components. • Species diversity and landscape composition are tied to livability components. • Achieving sustainable cities requires a cross-disciplinary approach. Biodiversity and urban design interlink in complex ways, more collaboration needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban forestry & urban greening
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129110
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lessons from exploring the relationship between livability and biodiversity in the built environment

Morteza Hazbei, Kayleigh Hutt‐Taylor, Carly D. Ziter, Nicole Yu et al.
2 citations
Urban forestry & urban greening
Urban Green Space and Health
2.40
article

Lessons from exploring the relationship between livability and biodiversity in the built environment

Morteza Hazbei, Kayleigh Hutt‐Taylor, Carly D. Ziter, Nicole Yu, Tatev Yesayan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Urban design and ecology usually operate in silos despite their shared goal of advancing sustainable cities. Livability is predominantly concerned with the quality of the built environment, often neglecting ecological considerations. Conversely, biodiversity focuses on preserving life forms and ecosystem functions, often overlooking the intricacies of the built environment. This disjointed approach limits our understanding of the interactions between these fields and hinders interdisciplinary practice. Our research explores the existing relationships between biodiversity and livability to expand our understanding of the exchanges between the two disciplines, and their combined effect in improving our cities. To achieve this, we employed an expert elicitation method grounded in a heuristic, exploratory, and knowledge-based approach. This methodology enabled us to first deconstruct the broad and often ambiguous concepts of livability and biodiversity into concrete domains, each with its own specific components, and then examine the connections between the two fields in the urban environment. The results of this study reveal that although urban designers and ecologists approach the concepts of livability and biodiversity through strict disciplinary lenses, the two share significant areas of interaction. Our findings indicate that biodiversity acts as a hidden driver of livability. Functional Diversity emerges as a key domain of biodiversity, impacting domains of livability such as Comfort, and Sense of Place. Conversely, specific livability components such as Environmental Hazards Mitigation, Maintenance, Civic and Social Involvement, and Infrastructure Accessibility have the biggest impact on biodiversity across all domains. • Urban biodiversity is a hidden driver of livability. • Sense of place, comfort, and safety are closely tied to key biodiversity components. • Species diversity and landscape composition are tied to livability components. • Achieving sustainable cities requires a cross-disciplinary approach. Biodiversity and urban design interlink in complex ways, more collaboration needed.

Urban forestry & urban greeningVol. 113
Concordia University (US), Concordia University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Urban Green Space and Health
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.