Understanding PTSD and Dissociation in Wartime: Direct and Indirect Trauma Exposure

This study explores the mental health impact of potentially traumatic events (PTEs) during wartime, focusing on the prevalence and severity of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and dissociative symptoms among a sample of 1,511 Israeli adults exposed to the recent war. Data were collected during the third month of the Israel-Hamas war. Our findings reveal elevated clinical PTSD symptoms (36.8%) and dissociation (16.3%) across the population, including 17.8% of individuals not directly exposed to trauma who nonetheless reported PTSD symptoms above the clinical threshold. These results challenge the adequacy of DSM-5 Criterion A in ongoing conflict contexts, where indirect exposure can contribute significantly to psychological distress. Furthermore, participants exposed to three or more PTEs demonstrated markedly higher PTSD and dissociative symptoms, emphasizing the cumulative burden of repeated trauma. These findings suggest that clinicians must consider both the number and nature of PTEs when developing treatment plans. Additionally, mental health policies should account for the psychological effects of indirect trauma, particularly in settings of ongoing conflict, where the entire population is at risk. The study highlights the urgent need for tailored interventions that address the complex and enduring mental health challenges associated with both direct and by-proxy trauma exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2025.2571109
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding PTSD and Dissociation in Wartime: Direct and Indirect Trauma Exposure

Dori Rubinstein, Limor Aharonson‐Daniel, René T. Proyer, Ilan Harpaz‐Rotem et al.
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
article

Understanding PTSD and Dissociation in Wartime: Direct and Indirect Trauma Exposure

Dori Rubinstein, Limor Aharonson‐Daniel, René T. Proyer, Ilan Harpaz‐Rotem, Mooli Lahad, David Mizrahi
article en

Abstract

This study explores the mental health impact of potentially traumatic events (PTEs) during wartime, focusing on the prevalence and severity of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and dissociative symptoms among a sample of 1,511 Israeli adults exposed to the recent war. Data were collected during the third month of the Israel-Hamas war. Our findings reveal elevated clinical PTSD symptoms (36.8%) and dissociation (16.3%) across the population, including 17.8% of individuals not directly exposed to trauma who nonetheless reported PTSD symptoms above the clinical threshold. These results challenge the adequacy of DSM-5 Criterion A in ongoing conflict contexts, where indirect exposure can contribute significantly to psychological distress. Furthermore, participants exposed to three or more PTEs demonstrated markedly higher PTSD and dissociative symptoms, emphasizing the cumulative burden of repeated trauma. These findings suggest that clinicians must consider both the number and nature of PTEs when developing treatment plans. Additionally, mental health policies should account for the psychological effects of indirect trauma, particularly in settings of ongoing conflict, where the entire population is at risk. The study highlights the urgent need for tailored interventions that address the complex and enduring mental health challenges associated with both direct and by-proxy trauma exposure.

Journal of Trauma & DissociationVol. 27(2)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Luther University (KR), Yale University (US), VA Connecticut Healthcare System (US), Stress Engineering Services (United States) (US), Tel Hai Academic College (IL), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.