Wealth gap and happiness: a Southeast European (SEE) perspective

Purpose This study investigates the relationship between income inequality and happiness in Southeast European countries from 2010 to 2021. Design/methodology/approach A panel data approach was employed using statistical techniques within R, analyzing data from the World Bank and World Happiness Report. Robust random effects models were compared with pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) and fixed effects models. Findings The findings reveal that income inequality, measured by the Gini coefficient, does not significantly impact happiness. In contrast, social support, freedom to make life choices, and emotional states are crucial in shaping happiness. Practical implications The study's results have significant implications for Southeast European policymakers. The findings emphasize the importance of policies that enhance social support networks, promote individual autonomy, and address emotional well-being to improve overall happiness and quality of life in the region. Originality/value This research contributes uniquely to happiness economics and development economics by focusing on Southeast Europe, a region often underrepresented in literature. By emphasizing social and emotional factors over economic metrics, the study offers nuanced insights into well-being determinants and policy recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-12-2024-0615
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wealth gap and happiness: a Southeast European (SEE) perspective

Arbër Hoti, Driton Qehaja, Blend Berisha, Atdhetar Gara
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Wealth gap and happiness: a Southeast European (SEE) perspective

Arbër Hoti, Driton Qehaja, Blend Berisha, Atdhetar Gara
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the relationship between income inequality and happiness in Southeast European countries from 2010 to 2021. Design/methodology/approach A panel data approach was employed using statistical techniques within R, analyzing data from the World Bank and World Happiness Report. Robust random effects models were compared with pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) and fixed effects models. Findings The findings reveal that income inequality, measured by the Gini coefficient, does not significantly impact happiness. In contrast, social support, freedom to make life choices, and emotional states are crucial in shaping happiness. Practical implications The study's results have significant implications for Southeast European policymakers. The findings emphasize the importance of policies that enhance social support networks, promote individual autonomy, and address emotional well-being to improve overall happiness and quality of life in the region. Originality/value This research contributes uniquely to happiness economics and development economics by focusing on Southeast Europe, a region often underrepresented in literature. By emphasizing social and emotional factors over economic metrics, the study offers nuanced insights into well-being determinants and policy recommendations.

International Journal of Sociology and Social PolicyVol. 46(1-2)
South East European University (MK), South East European Research Centre (GR), University of Prishtina (XK), EU Business School, Geneva (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.