Improving the conducting and reporting of veterinary systematic reviews and scoping reviews to facilitate identification and dissemination via the VetSRev database

Veterinary medicine advances rapidly, generating extensive amounts of research. Systematic and scoping reviews synthesise evidence to help guide clinical decisions, improve welfare, influence policy, and shape research priorities. Unlike narrative reviews, they employ transparent, rigorous methods. This commentary presents insights from curating VetSRev, a decade-old, freely accessible repository containing an interactive list of published veterinary systematic and scoping reviews. Accessible, high-quality reviews strengthen public and owner trust, improve animal welfare, and promote evidence-based practice. Following established protocols and guidelines ensures quality, visibility, and VetSRev inclusion, thereby disseminating the reviews to users, advancing knowledge, informing research priorities, and enhancing clinical decision-making in veterinary medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Evidence
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v10i4.721
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the conducting and reporting of veterinary systematic reviews and scoping reviews to facilitate identification and dissemination via the VetSRev database

Heather K. Moberly, D. J. C. Grindlay, Elisa Martello, Lisa Morrow
Veterinary Evidence
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Improving the conducting and reporting of veterinary systematic reviews and scoping reviews to facilitate identification and dissemination via the VetSRev database

Heather K. Moberly, D. J. C. Grindlay, Elisa Martello, Lisa Morrow
article en

Abstract

Veterinary medicine advances rapidly, generating extensive amounts of research. Systematic and scoping reviews synthesise evidence to help guide clinical decisions, improve welfare, influence policy, and shape research priorities. Unlike narrative reviews, they employ transparent, rigorous methods. This commentary presents insights from curating VetSRev, a decade-old, freely accessible repository containing an interactive list of published veterinary systematic and scoping reviews. Accessible, high-quality reviews strengthen public and owner trust, improve animal welfare, and promote evidence-based practice. Following established protocols and guidelines ensures quality, visibility, and VetSRev inclusion, thereby disseminating the reviews to users, advancing knowledge, informing research priorities, and enhancing clinical decision-making in veterinary medicine.

Veterinary EvidenceVol. 10(4)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Nottingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.