Towards automatically verifying chemical structures: the powerful combination of <sup>1</sup> H NMR and IR spectroscopy

Human interpretation of spectroscopic data remains key to confirming newly synthesised chemical structures. Whilst there have been advances in automated spectral interpretation, the false positive and false negative rates remain too high to replace human interpretation. One approach, Automated Structure Verification (ASV), scores observed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra against predicted NMR spectra. We describe a method to extend this approach to infrared (IR) spectra and apply it alongside proton NMR spectra to distinguish between a challenging set of 99 similar isomer pairs. Based on relative scores, we classify each as correct, incorrect or unsolved. Our results show that IR can be used as an efficient automated method to distinguish similar isomers with an accuracy close to that of proton NMR. We further introduce a method to combine NMR and IR results and show that the combination significantly outperforms either technique alone. At a true positive rate of 90%, unsolved pairs are reduced to 0-15% using NMR and IR together compared to 27-49% using individual techniques alone. At a true positive rate of 95%, they are reduced to 15-30% from 39-70%. These results are a significant step towards efficient automated structure verification based on easily measured spectroscopy data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5sc06866e
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards automatically verifying chemical structures: the powerful combination of 1 H NMR and IR spectroscopy

Jane Rowlands, Tomas Leek, Richard J. Lewis, Peter W. A. Howe et al.
4 citations
Chemical Science
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
3.22
article

Towards automatically verifying chemical structures: the powerful combination of 1 H NMR and IR spectroscopy

Jane Rowlands, Tomas Leek, Richard J. Lewis, Peter W. A. Howe, Werngard Czechtizky, Jonathan M. Goodman, Lina Jonsson
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Human interpretation of spectroscopic data remains key to confirming newly synthesised chemical structures. Whilst there have been advances in automated spectral interpretation, the false positive and false negative rates remain too high to replace human interpretation. One approach, Automated Structure Verification (ASV), scores observed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra against predicted NMR spectra. We describe a method to extend this approach to infrared (IR) spectra and apply it alongside proton NMR spectra to distinguish between a challenging set of 99 similar isomer pairs. Based on relative scores, we classify each as correct, incorrect or unsolved. Our results show that IR can be used as an efficient automated method to distinguish similar isomers with an accuracy close to that of proton NMR. We further introduce a method to combine NMR and IR results and show that the combination significantly outperforms either technique alone. At a true positive rate of 90%, unsolved pairs are reduced to 0-15% using NMR and IR together compared to 27-49% using individual techniques alone. At a true positive rate of 95%, they are reduced to 15-30% from 39-70%. These results are a significant step towards efficient automated structure verification based on easily measured spectroscopy data.

Chemical ScienceVol. 16(45)
University of Cambridge (GB), The Francis Crick Institute (GB), AstraZeneca (Netherlands) (NL), AstraZeneca (Finland) (FI), AstraZeneca (Sweden) (SE)
AstraZeneca, Dell EMC, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Science and Technology Facilities Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.