Mesozoic formations in Norway as CO₂-enhanced geothermal systems reservoirs: A pathway to efficient energy production

This article presents a novel analysis of laboratory test results conducted on core samples from the Åre Formation in the Norwegian Sea, as well as the Skagerrak and Ula Formations in the North Sea. The study addresses the critical challenge of utilizing sedimentary rocks from these Mesozoic formations as geothermal reservoirs for Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) technology, with a focus on using supercritical carbon dioxide (CO₂–EGS) as the working fluid in Norway. This is particularly significant given the growing demand for sustainable energy solutions and the urgent need to reduce carbon emissions. A total of ten core samples from the Åre, Ula, and Skagerrak Formations were analyzed to assess their geothermal reservoir potential. Laboratory investigations included petrophysical tests, effective porosity measurements ranging from 1.94 % to 21.52 % (average 11.66 %), conducted using low-field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Mercury Intrusion Capillary Pressure (MICP). The median pore diameters ranged from 0.031 μm to 3.255 μm (average 0.97 μm by MICP, 1.32 μm by NMR). Permeability values varied widely, from 0.053 to 67.467 mD, reflecting significant heterogeneity in pore structure. Mechanical tests based on ultrasonic P- and S-wave velocities (ranging from 2417 to 5100 m/s and 1355–2570 m/s, respectively) enabled the calculation of dynamic elastic moduli. The average values were: Young’s modulus – 18.91 GPa, bulk modulus – 17.19 GPa, and shear modulus – 7.35 GPa. Skeletal density was higher in Åre and Ula formations (∼2.65 g/cm³) than in Skagerrak (∼2.33 g/cm³), correlating with observed differences in porosity. The analysis revealed that the Ula Formation exhibits the widest parameter variability, with some samples qualifying as both petrothermal and hydrothermal EGS reservoirs, while all Skagerrak samples aligned with hydrothermal classification. Notably, the Åre Formation exhibited the best combination of high elastic parameters, porosity, and versatility, making it a strong candidate for CO₂–EGS development. This study underscores the innovative potential of integrating CO₂ sequestration with geothermal energy production in Norway. It provides a valuable dataset for evaluating sedimentary formations as viable CO₂–EGS reservoirs, offering new opportunities for cleaner, ore efficient energy systems in geologically diverse regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Reports
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.09.033
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mesozoic formations in Norway as CO₂-enhanced geothermal systems reservoirs: A pathway to efficient energy production

Artur Krzyżak, Lars A. Stenvik, Anna Sowiżdżał, Grzegorz Machowski et al.
Energy Reports
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Mesozoic formations in Norway as CO₂-enhanced geothermal systems reservoirs: A pathway to efficient energy production

Artur Krzyżak, Lars A. Stenvik, Anna Sowiżdżał, Grzegorz Machowski, P. Krakowska, Bjørn Frengstad, Edyta Puskarczyk, Michał Fajt
article en

Abstract

This article presents a novel analysis of laboratory test results conducted on core samples from the Åre Formation in the Norwegian Sea, as well as the Skagerrak and Ula Formations in the North Sea. The study addresses the critical challenge of utilizing sedimentary rocks from these Mesozoic formations as geothermal reservoirs for Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) technology, with a focus on using supercritical carbon dioxide (CO₂–EGS) as the working fluid in Norway. This is particularly significant given the growing demand for sustainable energy solutions and the urgent need to reduce carbon emissions. A total of ten core samples from the Åre, Ula, and Skagerrak Formations were analyzed to assess their geothermal reservoir potential. Laboratory investigations included petrophysical tests, effective porosity measurements ranging from 1.94 % to 21.52 % (average 11.66 %), conducted using low-field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Mercury Intrusion Capillary Pressure (MICP). The median pore diameters ranged from 0.031 μm to 3.255 μm (average 0.97 μm by MICP, 1.32 μm by NMR). Permeability values varied widely, from 0.053 to 67.467 mD, reflecting significant heterogeneity in pore structure. Mechanical tests based on ultrasonic P- and S-wave velocities (ranging from 2417 to 5100 m/s and 1355–2570 m/s, respectively) enabled the calculation of dynamic elastic moduli. The average values were: Young’s modulus – 18.91 GPa, bulk modulus – 17.19 GPa, and shear modulus – 7.35 GPa. Skeletal density was higher in Åre and Ula formations (∼2.65 g/cm³) than in Skagerrak (∼2.33 g/cm³), correlating with observed differences in porosity. The analysis revealed that the Ula Formation exhibits the widest parameter variability, with some samples qualifying as both petrothermal and hydrothermal EGS reservoirs, while all Skagerrak samples aligned with hydrothermal classification. Notably, the Åre Formation exhibited the best combination of high elastic parameters, porosity, and versatility, making it a strong candidate for CO₂–EGS development. This study underscores the innovative potential of integrating CO₂ sequestration with geothermal energy production in Norway. It provides a valuable dataset for evaluating sedimentary formations as viable CO₂–EGS reservoirs, offering new opportunities for cleaner, ore efficient energy systems in geologically diverse regions.

Energy ReportsVol. 14
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.