How to navigate the intermediate levels of vehicle automation?

• To safely navigate the intermediate levels of automation we must shift perspective towards more human-centered approaches. • The Driver/Automation Fitness plane provides insight into when and why to switch control between driver and automation. • A Driver/Automation mediator predicts driver and system fitness to optimally divide driving tasks in real time. • From human-centered design perspective we defined three human-centered driving modes rather than six levels of automation. • The HMI of human-centered driving modes must primarily show the current operation mode and remaining time-budget clearly. As the world moves towards higher levels of vehicle automation, the interplay between human drivers and automated systems becomes increasingly complex. This paper addresses the challenges of navigating the intermediate levels of vehicle automation, the transition stage from human driven vehicles to automated vehicles. The step-by-step introduction of automated features introduces new risks, such as mode confusion and over-reliance on automation, as well as mental underload or overload which lead to decreased driver performance and increased crash risk. In addition, during the transition, automation technology is still maturing and also has its limitations. In our view, we should aim to integrate the strengths of both human drivers and automation to enhance traffic safety and driver comfort. This paper aims to contribute conceptually to the scientific discourse on vehicle automation and to focus future research. It presents four key concepts that have proven to be meaningful to change perspective, including the Driver/Automation Fitness Plane, the definition of human-centered driving modes, and the mediator approach to seamless collaboration between driver and automation. These concepts are designed to facilitate a safer and more intuitive interaction between humans and automated systems, leveraging interdisciplinary perspectives on technology, behavior, cognition, and design. The paper concludes with a discussion on the potential of automation and calls for a human-centered approach to fully realize the benefits of vehicle automation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101664
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to navigate the intermediate levels of vehicle automation?

Nicole van Nes, Michiel Christoph, Ingrid van Schagen
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

How to navigate the intermediate levels of vehicle automation?

Nicole van Nes, Michiel Christoph, Ingrid van Schagen
article en

Abstract

• To safely navigate the intermediate levels of automation we must shift perspective towards more human-centered approaches. • The Driver/Automation Fitness plane provides insight into when and why to switch control between driver and automation. • A Driver/Automation mediator predicts driver and system fitness to optimally divide driving tasks in real time. • From human-centered design perspective we defined three human-centered driving modes rather than six levels of automation. • The HMI of human-centered driving modes must primarily show the current operation mode and remaining time-budget clearly. As the world moves towards higher levels of vehicle automation, the interplay between human drivers and automated systems becomes increasingly complex. This paper addresses the challenges of navigating the intermediate levels of vehicle automation, the transition stage from human driven vehicles to automated vehicles. The step-by-step introduction of automated features introduces new risks, such as mode confusion and over-reliance on automation, as well as mental underload or overload which lead to decreased driver performance and increased crash risk. In addition, during the transition, automation technology is still maturing and also has its limitations. In our view, we should aim to integrate the strengths of both human drivers and automation to enhance traffic safety and driver comfort. This paper aims to contribute conceptually to the scientific discourse on vehicle automation and to focus future research. It presents four key concepts that have proven to be meaningful to change perspective, including the Driver/Automation Fitness Plane, the definition of human-centered driving modes, and the mediator approach to seamless collaboration between driver and automation. These concepts are designed to facilitate a safer and more intuitive interaction between humans and automated systems, leveraging interdisciplinary perspectives on technology, behavior, cognition, and design. The paper concludes with a discussion on the potential of automation and calls for a human-centered approach to fully realize the benefits of vehicle automation.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 34
Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.